Re: [http-auth] Authentication-Info

Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com> Tue, 02 December 2014 14:25 UTC

Return-Path: <msweet@apple.com>
X-Original-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0E021ACDFF for <http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 06:25:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QUGq2hBrpZOs for <http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 06:25:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-in4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.151.62.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB20E1ACE0A for <http-auth@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 06:25:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=apple.com; s=mailout2048s; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@apple.com; t=1417530321; x=2281443921; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-id:To:Cc:MIME-version:Content-type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-reply-to:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Zhj7OKxh7H4T9gpTDLg2YhlWd/9AkDEDOBy9XFjAJK4=; b=JaycsvTd0iVY/qjvLcl1ZjlE1i2tTf6TxQvOr4huG1fyGkEmeACn4ywEGSE9vZ5d 6HFSKnLrIO3JAaRQAG/KKhhxHO/4E9sFT2IitfeOpLATZaHGoIvpVrdhhbPLGHuB n33hFD5oHC9A0BmRjyi1YUPgIZJDa5oU5Ypc2RFoBJKN8qk2b0nIKgwk/VJYjsuT YLEDKYUQF7amP0MEGiCjJ/oBp299HwH7GlMpfvnLZ3IiOEMo0jy0yHk0+7ko/iGG iBZ0p0l2eppH2B75rlvl9xvjFWCpobF+Ccuq05YHUmH1Thpn8nKKyMLtKtC458Jj OAP0n5icvLFOwarmIAo0sA==;
Received: from relay7.apple.com (relay7.apple.com [17.128.113.101]) by mail-in4.apple.com (Apple Secure Mail Relay) with SMTP id B0.0D.12968.1DBCD745; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 06:25:21 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 11973e12-f79306d0000032a8-c8-547dcbd1c02b
Received: from cardamom.apple.com (cardamom.apple.com [17.128.115.94]) (using TLS with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay7.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 1A.E6.06091.2BBCD745; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 06:24:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [17.153.21.172] by cardamom.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.30.0 64bit (built Oct 22 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0NFY00GEXLE69730@cardamom.apple.com> for http-auth@ietf.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 06:25:20 -0800 (PST)
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
Content-type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6E2499BD-56B4-4ACF-9615-D67956418C44"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
From: Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <547DC889.1070607@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 09:25:17 -0500
Message-id: <029A2653-2F50-4A75-BEC3-051C3D1CE93F@apple.com>
References: <547DB5D1.5040909@gmx.de> <80CDF820-6493-46BD-BB36-2E4990B966DF@apple.com> <547DC889.1070607@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrJLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUi2FCYqnvxdG2Iwa0XrBYf9s9hcmD0WLLk J1MAYxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxs/ud0wFvywqtv35wdLA+Nmsi5GTQ0LAROLAlg1MELaYxIV7 69m6GLk4hAT2MUpM397LDFPUM+06K0RiIpPEku5jLBDOH0aJhrebWUCqhAV0JO49O8oKYvMK 6Ek0PXnMBFLELDCFUWLnoXuMIAk2ATWJ35P6wIo4gezHH46zg9gsAqoSx49OAbOZBXQllp7s ZoQYZCNxb2Mj2H1CAkUSJ/5uYQOxRQS0JG7f28sIcZ6sxL+LZ9hBlkkIrGGT+HzwI8sERqFZ SA6ZheyQWWBLtCWWLXzNDGEbSDztfMUKYZtKPHm7nQ3Ctpb4OecRVL2ixJTuh+wLGNlXMQrl Jmbm6GbmmeglFhTkpOol5+duYgTFxXQ7oR2Mp1ZZHWIU4GBU4uE9cb4mRIg1say4MvcQozQH i5I470792hAhgfTEktTs1NSC1KL4otKc1OJDjEwcnFINjPUrFyzxc/B90Hg/6OqNhkW9c031 JnDMmPhjzXqBto3/9ad3J60XuOxh3H5DXGF5oYzm516RdTXb77GrnfyyeNcVRt29k5dMk3Wd 2aPktLpms3FTiVrL1VBffZeb+1qUupcW2csbqy5yVPh93KVNR9yT9VLhxoCpp3kSlMxSYgLf WB+6bGdyTImlOCPRUIu5qDgRAPRZ/GNsAgAA
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrBLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUi2FAcp7vpdG2IwdHnMhYf9s9hcmD0WLLk J1MAYxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxs/ud0wFvywqtv35wdLA+Nmsi5GTQ0LARKJn2nVWCFtM4sK9 9WxdjFwcQgITmSSWdB9jgXD+MEo0vN3MAlIlLKAjce/ZUbAOXgE9iaYnj5lAipgFpjBK7Dx0 jxEkwSagJvF7Uh9YESeQ/fjDcXYQm0VAVeL40SlgNrOArsTSk92MEINsJO5tbGQCsYUEiiRO /N3CBmKLCGhJ3L63lxHiPFmJfxfPsE9g5J+FZPcsZLtngc3Vlli28DUzhG0g8bTzFSuEbSrx 5O12NgjbWuLnnEdQ9YoSU7ofsi9gZF/FKFCUmpNYaa6XWFCQk6qXnJ+7iREcxoWpOxgbl1sd YhTgYFTi4T1xviZEiDWxrLgy9xCjCtCIRxtWX2CUYsnLz0tVEuH9ZVwbIsSbklhZlVqUH19U mpNafIhRmoNFSZw35VFuiJBAemJJanZqakFqEUyWiYNTqoGxznnSza9vVsjYBlhop8Y+qvvW HX0vlkP7e7eK07XUGemKy+ZvyKsXMJqSsPqrnXqe7qKuKOUvno43Db6wGNzTNN69cwdf7nXG lt+drgdY8tZJHZjJ/eOvDfPkX/Eu05/uOaizbisTp0GF2jyfEOb5xYvq1og/3H7hBtPuSu5K VmeLf3u/Lw5WYinOSDTUYi4qTgQAT1fbzGsCAAA=
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/http-auth/MWthua8PXcCy2eqHShDQ_pqkPio
Cc: "http-auth@ietf.org" <http-auth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [http-auth] Authentication-Info
X-BeenThere: http-auth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: HTTP authentication methods <http-auth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/http-auth>, <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-auth/>
List-Post: <mailto:http-auth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-auth>, <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 14:25:30 -0000

> ...
> Changing the syntax sounds like a breaking change to Digest to me.

If optional, it wouldn't break Digest but would not provide a way for new implementations to adopt it.

_________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair