[http-auth] Call for Acceptance: draft-oiwa-http-mutualauth and draft-oiwa-http-auth-extension
Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com> Wed, 10 April 2013 11:23 UTC
Return-Path: <ynir@checkpoint.com>
X-Original-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB1421F9322 for <http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 04:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.716
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.716 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.883, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iJnSkLhQC-I7 for <http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 04:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.checkpoint.com (smtp.checkpoint.com [194.29.34.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01B6221F93EA for <http-auth@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 04:23:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DAG-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([194.29.34.150]) by smtp.checkpoint.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r3ABNier024000 for <http-auth@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:23:44 +0300
X-CheckPoint: {51654B94-2-1B221DC2-1FFFF}
Received: from IL-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([169.254.2.54]) by DAG-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([169.254.3.48]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.003; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:23:44 +0300
From: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
To: "http-auth@ietf.org" <http-auth@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Call for Acceptance: draft-oiwa-http-mutualauth and draft-oiwa-http-auth-extension
Thread-Index: AQHONd3cEJKzd+8TC0WdAoqIjGc32w==
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:23:43 +0000
Message-ID: <8A42F29D-9C13-45E0-87F1-8F477E7AB631@checkpoint.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.31.20.52]
x-kse-antivirus-interceptor-info: scan successful
x-kse-antivirus-info: Clean
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <801E5B1E220C954E9C5969E4D25BE075@ad.checkpoint.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [http-auth] Call for Acceptance: draft-oiwa-http-mutualauth and draft-oiwa-http-auth-extension
X-BeenThere: http-auth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: HTTP authentication methods <http-auth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/http-auth>, <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-auth>
List-Post: <mailto:http-auth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-auth>, <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:23:48 -0000
Hi folks As per our charter, we are considering taking on draft-oiwa-http-mutualauth and draft-oiwa-http-auth-extension to eventually publish as experimental RFCs. This is the call for acceptance. Please reply to this mail with a response such as: - yes, we should take this on, and I can be counted on to review it and contribute text in needed. - no, we should not take this on because… The documents will be accepted only if there are sufficient reviewers volunteering. Just to make it interesting, we also require that each document author review at least one other document. Thanks Matt & Yoav