Re: [http-auth] First draft of HTTP Signatures published
Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com> Sun, 12 May 2013 15:07 UTC
Return-Path: <ynir@checkpoint.com>
X-Original-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 331D121F8D14 for <http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 May 2013 08:07:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.612
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.612 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8Nng6VHsCScA for <http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 May 2013 08:07:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.checkpoint.com (smtp.checkpoint.com [194.29.34.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D227721F8709 for <http-auth@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 May 2013 08:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DAG-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([194.29.34.150]) by smtp.checkpoint.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r4CF78Vf012834; Sun, 12 May 2013 18:07:14 +0300
X-CheckPoint: {518FAE4F-E-1B221DC2-1FFFF}
Received: from IL-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([169.254.2.54]) by DAG-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([169.254.3.48]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.003; Sun, 12 May 2013 18:04:43 +0300
From: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Thread-Topic: [http-auth] First draft of HTTP Signatures published
Thread-Index: AQHOTaxcGLfKsfPu0kKEZwtLkyHGXJkAtmaAgACjdgCAAByhAA==
Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 15:04:43 +0000
Message-ID: <DAFEE6FB-E012-4F0D-AA4E-1D45E6917F38@checkpoint.com>
References: <518D3C8B.3080807@digitalbazaar.com> <14CD3EC8-7302-4D8E-8575-1400352C7465@checkpoint.com> <518F9794.6080905@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <518F9794.6080905@cs.tcd.ie>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.31.20.25]
x-kse-antivirus-interceptor-info: scan successful
x-kse-antivirus-info: Clean
x-cpdlp: 11f56a36416dbcd3e44a5c04cc400720e6aaa03d22
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <9EB52E84FDC1B04288E4B36A5B0B281F@ad.checkpoint.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: HTTP Auth WG <http-auth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [http-auth] First draft of HTTP Signatures published
X-BeenThere: http-auth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: HTTP authentication methods <http-auth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/http-auth>, <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-auth>
List-Post: <mailto:http-auth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-auth>, <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 15:07:39 -0000
Works for me, especially since WebSec is still a long way from deciding to work on session continuation/management. Yoav On May 12, 2013, at 4:22 PM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: > > Yoav, > > On 05/12/2013 04:37 AM, Yoav Nir wrote: >> Hi Manu >> >> The HTTP-Auth working group is chartered to work on a very specific set of documents. OTOH, the WebSec working group is considering adopting a work item for session continuation. Session continuation is supposed to be a replacement for authorizing requests via session cookies. See the problem statement here: >> >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-williams-websec-session-continue-prob-00 >> >> If I understand correctly, your draft is aiming to solve that issue. So you might prefer to take your draft there. > > Fair points. But I do think some discussion of the differences between > Manu's proposal and HOBA on this list might be beneficial before any > conclusion as to IETF WG venue etc are reached. > > In addition I think Manu regards his scheme as a primary user > authentication scheme and not as a session continuation scheme which > again argues for discussing it here. > > The above discussion will be more useful when we've posted the rev > of HOBA, which will be in the next few days. > > Cheers, > S. (as participant, of course;-) > > > > > >> Yoav Nir (as co-chair of both groups) >> >> On May 10, 2013, at 9:29 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: >> >>> The HTTP Signatures spec is a digital signature mechanism for the HTTP >>> protocol. It adds origin authentication, message integrity, and replay >>> resistance to HTTP requests. This is useful for any application that >>> currently depends on Basic, Digest, OAuth, or OAuth2 authentication when >>> performing RESTful HTTP calls. >>> >>> Basically, if a client needs to prove to a server that it sent an >>> HTTP-based message, it can digitally sign that message. This spec >>> defines exactly how that happens. >>> >>> This spec will be used by the Web Payments / PaySwarm / Web Keys work at >>> W3C. We're going to combine the public/private key-based signature >>> mechanism defined in HTTP Signatures with the public key infrastructure >>> system as defined in Web Keys to provide an easy way for nodes on the >>> Internet to verify their identity to other nodes on the Internet. >>> >>> The first draft of this spec was just published via the Internet >>> Engineering Task Force (IETF) earlier today: >>> >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cavage-http-signatures-00 >>> >>> You can also find a datetime-stamped version of the spec here: >>> >>> https://payswarm.com/specs/ED/http-signatures/2013-05-04/ >>> >>> The latest version of the spec can be found on the PaySwarm specs page: >>> >>> https://payswarm.com/specs/ >>> >>> -- manu >>> >>> -- >>> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) >>> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. >>> blog: Meritora - Web payments commercial launch >>> http://blog.meritora.com/launch/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> http-auth mailing list >>> http-auth@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-auth >>> >>> Email secured by Check Point >> >> _______________________________________________ >> http-auth mailing list >> http-auth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-auth >> >> > > Email secured by Check Point
- [http-auth] First draft of HTTP Signatures publis… Manu Sporny
- Re: [http-auth] First draft of HTTP Signatures pu… Yoav Nir
- Re: [http-auth] First draft of HTTP Signatures pu… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [http-auth] First draft of HTTP Signatures pu… Yoav Nir
- Re: [http-auth] First draft of HTTP Signatures pu… Manu Sporny
- Re: [http-auth] First draft of HTTP Signatures pu… Manu Sporny
- Re: [http-auth] First draft of HTTP Signatures pu… Manu Sporny
- Re: [http-auth] First draft of HTTP Signatures pu… Manger, James H
- Re: [http-auth] First draft of HTTP Signatures pu… Mark Cavage
- Re: [http-auth] First draft of HTTP Signatures pu… Ken Murchison
- Re: [http-auth] First draft of HTTP Signatures pu… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [http-auth] First draft of HTTP Signatures pu… Michael Richardson
- Re: [http-auth] First draft of HTTP Signatures pu… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- [http-auth] Session continuation and authenticati… Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [http-auth] Session continuation and authenti… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [http-auth] Session continuation and authenti… Michael Thomas
- Re: [http-auth] Session continuation and authenti… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [http-auth] Session continuation and authenti… Ilari Liusvaara