[http-auth] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpauth-mutual-algo-06: (with COMMENT)

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 03 November 2016 02:03 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <147813861228.24090.9299414198966449646.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 19:03:32 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/http-auth/zCl98_yBrZukYALeoGe33ilaXcw>
Cc: http-auth@ietf.org, httpauth-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-httpauth-mutual-algo@ietf.org
Subject: [http-auth] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpauth-mutual-algo-06: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-httpauth-mutual-algo-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpauth-mutual-algo/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree with Mirja that the IPR section in this draft seems misplaced,
and applies more to the mutual-auth mechanism draft. If it needs to stay
in this draft, please see my comment about the similar section in the
mutual-auth draft.

[http-auth] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-… Ben Campbell