[httpapi] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on charter-ietf-httpapi-00-00: (with COMMENT)

[Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-httpapi-00-00: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-httpapi/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

** (Like Martin and Alissa) I’m having trouble discriminating what work comes
to HTTPbis as opposed to this proposed WG.  As written, does all HTTP for web
browser go to HTTPbis; and machine-to-machine comes here?

** Per “Proposals for new HTTP status codes, methods, or other generic
extensions, to be considered by the HTTP Working Group”, why would this WG
propose new work for HTTPbis, instead of doing it?

** How do when know when this WG is done?

** Can the initial milestones please be added