IETF Logo Mail Archive

[httpapi] Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpapi-deprecation-header-05.txt> (The Deprecation HTTP Header Field) to Proposed Standard

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Sat, 24 August 2024 06:25 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91523C14F71D; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 23:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmx.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ASAOZ-jZGxj5; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 23:25:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3070DC14F61A; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 23:25:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmx.de; s=s31663417; t=1724480749; x=1725085549; i=julian.reschke@gmx.de; bh=AUgoEoJCZJfoL1TuP8uktbNHmowexO/4attN4BBj/DU=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc: References:From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:cc:content-transfer-encoding: content-type:date:from:message-id:mime-version:reply-to:subject: to; b=ryClyu1YS9hdH9R6wLUbcG0jChh27xDdNbnuUjRuX30OyJFAJwm560WiR6U6VX1c U0Zd0xtISsjpDudx462TDgrTtjEF3dUmxfO/ZARXpFJOOx8ntXjliZMR00H2CnZcl E0LWmHCxdy9zOOFC+g2aT0G9rJW/zzB2NBa+hr+RHqJzG9ktIttwRK5bEdpfPa4rB oVHK7D0Mp2TxvsQ0qpHrc5OTSW514Fewz7eAe0qib5ql6Ijs8s/yWIrB7OCTzGABp hlog37z8wgc3UkYimb8nevodqNcw7G92FUBNwJWrkmI3ztbPz69sLPXOFmc82PPa9 meV2YzmhmoeDMeQNmQ==
X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a
Received: from [192.168.178.182] ([217.251.131.108]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MD9T7-1sqEf60W6j-00GXet; Sat, 24 Aug 2024 08:25:49 +0200
Message-ID: <dbc066ee-5962-49a3-a539-ce53966031e2@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 08:25:47 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot=40mnot.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <172442671239.127588.8133983778126810167@dt-datatracker-584cd6c8dd-fvr2f> <b46ef258-cad2-45ea-a210-9253a3b6cb34@gmx.de> <9B7F3D97-6D58-4C57-A1D0-BEF3F1754EB2@mnot.net>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <9B7F3D97-6D58-4C57-A1D0-BEF3F1754EB2@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:l4uGmaEBqy1wZ+OCX1jV5ld2x/rCLdu3CQhKPuVQvKSfygQHP88 ORVhm/0qKSAR7iLjM4KYtb2qauQvqYK1tTX8EvMGhocV8lKmi5b5HA6P3BpWiU372+Zd9X0 wfXtQFHyvcwdNQ4b+MqEcLkNhFckTtdThqeZ+Genjsc0m/JWFX8hGOzdKzlQce+7MulFRgP OEakgysptZTot0R5YfNaw==
UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:ih+FPB+83BY=;N/ZGSeoQTzYX6RxXjLokATBbYsu KQz/Rl35fWEHWcGqtZuLs4URjbBdWUOIGv72R4ePC0GqlH8lHk5k+O5JBppKNtTXfY3h1AtbU /2k25d8suas1r3zHY9AU+p/Temp3BAwIRSjpXxuoH3nQSKWW2HgE5U3Qz6486nxSQsxqxApHv P5R4uurzfO9Fi3b0Dt0nlgloutesSjjEnhJOWAGrjZ3GkElMKdDKlThvmGtXcc3ovdlnkqyWF hYfbiFne7jQahuLclEN40+dmmUjygbuQtG6ivjGLEca3ek1eBwkSzRzjXDbDAODGDHjjGvgZA o7NySh8J3qOMpGSQYygYZggESU6ke1Ph7eOlY2LUBYEJnxO3WBQn/Whxjd/hjt/8MxdcT0/5p Z9F7KmQqDdm6pgOgFAEdFgPT1kDeO58zGbQDiDbbfvFQkxf5LlUwEtCTGniWRNRXnAzKrohn0 562TeZJ2K3dHm9mUqtGYEBDC2ytAl47lMJ03W/v0+WAJurRfopu3pXK+FitC3KdLNEAjAdFtT mvemfVO7cKi+hOfP+ysHLmrP4coIsMBdFrlcXY4cclpkZLqw55MyNEP93vs7KEG5ZRwXJNImv PK7Yf45sv9XCm+pTb1kryfrS6bm6o0RYloM27T1SSEoNuAop1TU40SJRkszmdjcJw3pOOKTn7 wug1iwHdYGgPclcZcUy4s84ABK9kSY/CdIrnJ1o/3wz+ttix6PQwZJq2utIwLsGHZQuPGFP7H Y1G0l4m7ClQx/ffshxY/e1PLy0AuBa1PjRxF+kAcZKt/qEU3pgw+fHKu3wkcXcmbTxmdzlo3Z pqmQY1fH8PGiqTQrbVqWAHqEqH8r/Qhh/ISSqzHMSwPnU=
Message-ID-Hash: BSLO6MTU4RDL5PLUEH33S24KGKGQEZ4Q
X-Message-ID-Hash: BSLO6MTU4RDL5PLUEH33S24KGKGQEZ4Q
X-MailFrom: julian.reschke@gmx.de
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: httpapi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [httpapi] Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpapi-deprecation-header-05.txt> (The Deprecation HTTP Header Field) to Proposed Standard
List-Id: Building Blocks for HTTP APIs <httpapi.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/httpapi/e_0t-Q5isHfSJDMvjurJIWn5p6Y>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/httpapi>
List-Help: <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:httpapi-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:httpapi@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:httpapi-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:httpapi-leave@ietf.org>

On 24.08.2024 08:21, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> If it's using Structured Fields, it shouldn't be using ABNF.

It currently says in
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-httpapi-deprecation-header-05.html#name-syntax>:

> The Deprecation response header field describes the deprecation of the resource identified with the response it occurred within (see Section 6.4.2 of [HTTP]). It conveys the deprecation date, which may be in the future (the resource context will be deprecated at that date) or in the past (the resource context has been deprecated at that date). Deprecation is an Item Structured Header [RFC8941]. Refer to Section 3.3.7 of [STRUCTURED-FIELDS] for ABNF of sf-date:

So what would need to be removed is the mention of "ABNF".

Best regards, Julian

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status