[httpapi] Weekly github digest (HTTPAPI WG Activity Summary)
Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 13 November 2022 07:45 UTC
Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1052C14CF06 for <httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 23:45:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.694
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.694 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b=WS+2IjEo; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=tNtG1qKM
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id go675c9gDrRZ for <httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 23:45:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8843C14CEED for <httpapi@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 23:45:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 299865C00AE for <httpapi@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Nov 2022 02:39:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 13 Nov 2022 02:39:11 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-type:date:from:from:in-reply-to:mime-version:reply-to :sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1668325151; x= 1668411551; bh=gyFygNm00ppzkR2hOQDXvHNp2GX/TxOmxr8t3N+wXmo=; b=W S+2IjEoyj2kKa9PvQRvUTSLcL41Wd46Ur8Avn3xwnyc8oslcxToJgsO8kRNcxp5a 1vLpn5nTtYJv5Uie5LefJNx5sPfyAjdhdw+EEMQjByYKhPtGeggCfn332353Dtc6 +czdz4BTTTqDTsYVYekWX9hZjCGkbOLxZXA+Uieavr9/AUwcBMQwrNWCL3e3Pd78 DFBH1uSeHY8Vbx69BBx+QQDjxK6uUNeoy7UbndB/3f6Hqwp5k5oxnAl9pkJddVEk dtRuGFBupPnfwnTUfy+BVYz7oJS1hxeudmmMsshSyQ0OBLllvnxoo9vMy/p3m7IX /gB3UCPy7fV4hA/Ok4IDA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:mime-version:reply-to:sender :subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1668325151; x=1668411551; bh=g yFygNm00ppzkR2hOQDXvHNp2GX/TxOmxr8t3N+wXmo=; b=tNtG1qKMuAnQYlnRs 7PkIJufLHMvsPt2SurQ3Xx35RG+Sj/5JSaTMEFq4ZqjNVeMtz+CkGl9fzKW6VV7/ WQIzedSp1vyvAZNLIO2oXl9hc4BhfEDSwmyN5fB6C0x5XLgyFyT3sHnrRiZSYRjX 63NsskRy1hJPC79e7ZgGd9pWRWmklswKbzOqCfT5dzayGdi6tL+4lz8dgTzXrUKW 15d46+Aik+X1Y2BOCxCum3mZJ5nii6KoetARfpT25iNVq9zJEES28W9htmVVF1gn wBHloFgMzF25gCQhpdqT1N+rqOor0G6Rce/eVSScOu5jMgJc3xBLDGKoLVyTUYYv TiU/w==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:H59wY7GN_DxM-3aEwiaNWe5v8uH0hkziJ2IAQT8SyitTIsnuo8VrZg> <xme:H59wY4V290Mxe1fCG7_YhZgJ128z1M46NkIFNPeXixAD1FI5SQ-LSf5bQGml1U9zc 256e7A_hxUXj4bAug>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:H59wY9JM1dQPr75Mx0tBwzCsTXg_3BQg3gAdWXCePWV2M4i3HITN7oC7mnnxTTah2WEuRPk8u_WjM7uOcTruOuE1eWm2KNHDFIJwlkKch24ucLnhZy75pXEUF3Sr27oqJnIU>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvgedrfeelgdduudduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucfpohcuuggrthgvuchfihgvlhguucdlgeelmdenuc fjughrpegtggfhvffusegrtddtredttdejnecuhfhrohhmpeftvghpohhsihhtohhrhicu tegtthhivhhithihucfuuhhmmhgrrhihuceuohhtuceoughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihse hmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeefvdduteejvdefkeehieevuefg fefhteetveegffekffefteffvdelheduieetnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtg homhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpeegnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegu ohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:H59wY5HNUXSu9qHQq3oHzxH67dUejEAqA_3JKShkG4o8AF_m_Fdkig> <xmx:H59wYxWRdIEiBp4pQ3Nxboro0G1EA3VCWMm4q5kIKXIcenAOpwpxRg> <xmx:H59wY0NAPU-l6GMbcrwoaYM5pWMLPPXvB5BeN-tSgbAIHbE-SR2-_A> <xmx:H59wYwAVgKGKVJYtR4Vu8j2tQAnDRViRCro3Wr4LQpEpDhccNDJCQg>
Feedback-ID: i1c3946f2:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <httpapi@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Nov 2022 02:39:10 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============1520662136613147360=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: httpapi@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20221113074548.E8843C14CEED@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2022 23:45:48 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/httpapi/rKGK0XZ12w7HYpsN1w1oy1Fz4pQ>
Subject: [httpapi] Weekly github digest (HTTPAPI WG Activity Summary)
X-BeenThere: httpapi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Building Blocks for HTTP APIs <httpapi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/httpapi>, <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/httpapi/>
List-Post: <mailto:httpapi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/httpapi>, <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2022 07:45:53 -0000
Events without label "editorial"
Issues
------
* ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers (+1/-0/💬5)
1 issues created:
- How can a client correlate a service limit with the corresponding policy? (by darrelmiller)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/issues/121
2 issues received 5 new comments:
- #120 Clarification on requirements for server behavior. (2 by darrelmiller, ioggstream)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/issues/120
- #65 Field names and combination (3 by darrelmiller, ioggstream)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/issues/65 [discussion]
* ietf-wg-httpapi/idempotency (+2/-1/💬4)
2 issues created:
- Binary Structured Fields (by martinthomson)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/idempotency/issues/20
- Examples have extremely long lines (by martinthomson)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/idempotency/issues/19
2 issues received 4 new comments:
- #16 Change registration registry for the header field (1 by sdatspun2)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/idempotency/issues/16
- #4 add appendix about relationship with conditional requests (3 by darrelmiller, dret, sdatspun2)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/idempotency/issues/4
1 issues closed:
- Change registration registry for the header field https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/idempotency/issues/16
* ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis (+5/-0/💬12)
5 issues created:
- `Problem:` HTTP header field and localization (by benbucksch)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/issues/67
- Translation (by benbucksch)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/issues/66
- Avoid a default "type" (by benbucksch)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/issues/65
- Uncertainty created by the relative URIs used as IDs for problem "type" field (by benbucksch)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/issues/64
- Resolvability of IANA URIs (by mnot)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/issues/62
3 issues received 12 new comments:
- #65 Avoid a default "type" (1 by dret)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/issues/65
- #64 Uncertainty created by relative URIs used as IDs for problem "type" field (3 by benbucksch, darrelmiller)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/issues/64
- #62 Resolvability of IANA URIs (8 by asbjornu, dret, mnot, sazzer)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/issues/62
Pull requests
-------------
* ietf-wg-httpapi/idempotency (+1/-1/💬0)
1 pull requests submitted:
- Draft02 (by sdatspun2)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/idempotency/pull/18
1 pull requests merged:
- Draft02
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/idempotency/pull/18
* ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis (+0/-0/💬1)
1 pull requests received 1 new comments:
- #59 Add CDDL data definition for JSON form of problem object (1 by dret)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis/pull/59
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/wg-materials
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/idempotency
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/linkset
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/deprecation-header
- [httpapi] Weekly github digest (HTTPAPI WG Activi… Repository Activity Summary Bot