IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Additional status codes in HTTP/1.1

"Markus Lanthaler" <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> Thu, 25 July 2013 09:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B7D221F9633 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 02:36:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.15
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.15 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT=1.449, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hvOIRl1XFSfA for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 02:36:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9218621F9546 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 02:36:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1V2HxK-0007uf-51 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 09:35:30 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 09:35:30 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1V2HxK-0007uf-51@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>) id 1V2HxB-0007tw-KT for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 09:35:21 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>) id 1V2Hx9-0004fY-Um for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 09:35:21 +0000
Received: from Vostro3500 ([79.48.108.27]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M243n-1UEJxG1OA7-00u4lM for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 11:34:53 +0200
From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <20130725052453.GC31954@1wt.eu> <51F0C34B.1030709@gmx.de> <4251ed6b50ac66a402e3956437e5780a.squirrel@arekh.dyndns.org> <51F0E0C5.90606@gmx.de> <007301ce8916$126e08d0$374a1a70$@lanthaler@gmx.net> <51F0EC5C.2040302@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <51F0EC5C.2040302@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 11:34:48 +0200
Message-ID: <007b01ce891a$356a7f90$a03f7eb0$@lanthaler>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac6JF1HN/K00ujd9TwerIgmqNf4rtAAAsQ4w
Content-Language: de
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:HGTnp6L8hmNEMI0tt7fX69Wbakpi5krbXos6ktx4Z14zZ8KV14D JhoIN2k4BQ4jnyynnGrQLaU57L9M5XjQyO4c+W8sn8tKJQZf9tzjGXFCm82c2EtpZrv4c6w 01+6cFG7f8GlehKKnk5KLmFtUAi3exYIT4WKsxaNjUT+wJG+Q2BfMAqBKLjjvrW2R6ttXvM VUxG81mhh03pHK8pdDsjA==
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.22; envelope-from=markus.lanthaler@gmx.net; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.725, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1V2Hx9-0004fY-Um db747bfe4d415c24a10683452f5050b2
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: RE: Additional status codes in HTTP/1.1
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/007b01ce891a$356a7f90$a03f7eb0$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18920
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Thursday, July 25, 2013 11:14 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2013-07-25 11:05, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> > ...
> > What about just changing
> >
> >     Note that this list is not exhaustive -- it does not include
> >     extension status codes defined in other specifications.
> >
> > in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-
> 23#section-6.1 to something like
> >
> >     Note that this list is not exhaustive -- it does not include
> >     extension status codes defined in other specifications. IANA
> >     maintains a registry of all standardized status codes at [???]
> >
> > Unfortunately, AFAIK, the URLs of those registries are not stable so
> I'm not sure how to reference it properly.
> > ...
> 
> Well, they really really should be stable :-)

Well, then just include a link to http://www.iana.org/assignments/http-status-codes


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email