Re: Additional status codes in HTTP/1.1

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 25 July 2013 06:20 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B9221F8AD5 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 23:20:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y9UzbCRZ-DSV for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 23:20:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F2A321F99C1 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 23:20:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1V2Etj-000363-9y for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 06:19:35 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 06:19:35 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1V2Etj-000363-9y@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1V2EtX-000352-Vb for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 06:19:24 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1V2EtW-0004BL-5V for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 06:19:23 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.104] ([93.217.81.107]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Le5XQ-1UJ4NY0AyC-00prLw for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 08:18:56 +0200
Message-ID: <51F0C34B.1030709@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 08:18:51 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <20130725052453.GC31954@1wt.eu>
In-Reply-To: <20130725052453.GC31954@1wt.eu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:tUyaS9ICTPAtW3NX+dvb690+A2zbgDwqmdFblufMjXNMUX6HHao rjTtPhYThwP+axCeyg0vD/um34mW4q9zSHdGiN5dOhkqH2dyUxG7iT5COijP3lMIfAkQacE Q3tX4CoHIkvoUGEAY1XCSHNJT+pQCW0DZhdwsauY8i3tA299mmsbrPkZEvsPf2kL+/D2zbJ 9DDk4vQUbjeXLCg2o0zDA==
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.21; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.436, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1V2EtW-0004BL-5V babef182524a1dc51635ca9866ff6354
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Additional status codes in HTTP/1.1
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/51F0C34B.1030709@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18909
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2013-07-25 07:24, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A user notified me that status codes 428, 429, 431, 511 introduced in
> RFC6585 by Mark & Roy are not mentionned at all in the current 1.1 draft.
>
> Shouldn't we copy them there, or at least add a reference to RFC6585 so
> that implementers know that these codes exist ?
>
> Thanks,
> Willy

No, that would send the wrong message.

The list in the spec is not exhaustive; there's an IANA registry for a 
reason.

Best regards, Julian