draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-23, "6.3.6 205 Reset Content"
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 25 July 2013 06:31 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C52B21F9951 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 23:31:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wYqccmqBJ2j1 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 23:31:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2AD721F93BF for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 23:31:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1V2F4D-0001Ot-KV for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 06:30:25 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 06:30:25 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1V2F4D-0001Ot-KV@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1V2F43-0001Ng-Ge for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 06:30:15 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1V2F42-0004mZ-El for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 06:30:15 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.104] ([93.217.81.107]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MMTZa-1V1iPy1r9a-008Mt3 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 08:29:48 +0200
Message-ID: <51F0C5D7.5020100@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 08:29:43 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:4HuDm8cFUPUstQ3ghNvEQbvfFGbVtGW+4araFwoV2CZALjpXVJL mI7ETqTJdRwLIz4bIYvBJj7kq2YJwwwIREM9IhuskeKlft1ah0G83rXLbd4bvxgMVGOjj+8 gDAXXgIm39Ua5CWBXDI0DO+HoAENJpxCmpIsqu3sMB4guc5bzj2OcK1PfistIq0Af4ebOHR bU6liYbAV4Lx0kRV294Tw==
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.21; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.403, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1V2F42-0004mZ-El e0cecbbc194c01e09f6f6dfb21bc67eb
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-23, "6.3.6 205 Reset Content"
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/51F0C5D7.5020100@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18910
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-23.html#status.205>: "Since the 205 status code implies that no additional content will be provided in the payload, the server MUST send a message body of zero length. In other words, the server MUST send a "Content-Length: 0" field in a 205 response or close the connection immediately after sending the blank line terminating the header section." So would using Chunked Encoding be illegal? I don't think that was the intent. The simplest possible fix seems to drop the second sentence. Best regards, Julian Origin: user npcode in <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17826572/which-http-and-webdav-status-must-not-include-message-body/17827503?noredirect=1#comment26054009_17827503>
- draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-23, "6.3.6 205 Re… Julian Reschke
- #491, was: draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-23, "6… Julian Reschke
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-23, "6.3.6 20… Roy T. Fielding
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-23, "6.3.6 20… Julian Reschke