Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-16

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Mon, 07 June 2021 23:29 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D9023A16B4 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 16:29:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=QhfdyJFH; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=kWthUFaD
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WpkTLFTYd5u9 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 16:28:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F1103A16B3 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 16:28:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1lqOcD-0003Yf-DP for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2021 23:25:09 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2021 23:25:05 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1lqOcD-0003Yf-DP@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1lqObA-0003Tp-Qi for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2021 23:24:06 +0000
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1lqOaZ-0004nI-LM for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2021 23:23:56 +0000
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC8555C01E9; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 19:23:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 07 Jun 2021 19:23:09 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm2; bh=U 5BbBSr3BEFgz6miXT6tQMDKUa2218XdggyPgUSvPIg=; b=QhfdyJFHHb0PMC1UW PRC5hX8OWkeGyliWwg4ui2GR55xUr7QFsurhkwmZCNlxbjMehWlZGxGzpUTfUo3Y HR7v34YBGGNxEbrb9ihZ3JJwk6CtZE1/xOHu6etYpQYOqPzHtNDc7W2TF89CAxjJ hWY4PCcNpyvW9RFR6vOPDt1j9Fu+rRa5IuNRkBEbP/CAuWvjDx3y1vLBc0yc86bn oxrZ8emOYtH1kM1Rgqhho0iwqzqKK5+jF0naThfNtAGd+UK/cpE6ES7+AwFyS8Vt heTewj3CBE8DQIeOXpTkdP+4EwPFZsHHeN8puZmbETaKQFLXHjV6wMJM4N+oAxN1 ITUyg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=U5BbBSr3BEFgz6miXT6tQMDKUa2218XdggyPgUSvP Ig=; b=kWthUFaDGp4zOPn6TTT7SER4zsb6PqlPz1QMEE1KbgPn+fiRNDjf9/zL3 eMIa60CnvQzmkKB5T8+cYl5YAURo0+MBmkx3FnsX9746KgfqzflLZGU4RJbc2E2d D7805BQ3h85AjlEAT1oCo06lJTBcKwzVxLns0Kci/xkItU3Y7ZyCM2vRNjuR3Fwe tfrk/DqkbazLAI+RohFst0Gl1Jp5ngWN4h4TbzvTfkSKe8XD/Yrru9sL3PvUMthX UqhVuoVptNmdzg6ezMqAAqlFCxan8Lz4pjfKhGj6dZsKPNQa1nOxLJUe9gBEuG/S Y/+JCSd4ohfmG6PuI26lInSLzl+MQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:W6q-YCvWTgzL0H4FhzIlsw7RMPr3PeAiUjhY-9--hyb3vfYYpOKs_A> <xme:W6q-YHfulROSWeE8dCGcWZvbcKnKMIJBOmnboGh5GYOvQVj4mfkHS8jRSTMTmIsXm bLI4oTXUch-91neMw>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:W6q-YNzKKQrNRFE_bjM2xx_CeG13PWE7oghIWfbWpdbtnH0B-8uBnA1z0BZ1F9aCKIjhDmpdGDFsnijOailoX6J2PYbjPUS5Unmkkyj912MY_RPSTTzBzMku>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrfedtkedgudduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptggguffhjgffgffkfhfvofesthhqmhdthhdtvdenucfhrhhomhepofgrrhhk ucfpohhtthhinhhghhgrmhcuoehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeevffffhfduteevvefhueffieegtdeutdehffeltefffedttdeggeejheeiueet teenucffohhmrghinhepmhhnohhtrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenuc frrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:W6q-YNNzwO_TU4sBXYRRt4LL0gimUEWXcVFN8dwPsrsjPtcsdQuskQ> <xmx:W6q-YC-nyPkupFVN6WkSlAa52XWVlVnzjdhJQdP0m9g0HOxjO0CS5w> <xmx:W6q-YFUF3gKeWGkKIVmiAAtvgw0E_MjoI8ys08tO1Jn_MvRw4gjhDg> <xmx:Xaq-YCwcmpTpR4ICJiX5Gh3qHRmFkNX_TCK5Hh_i7YVj7nf7D4rpnQ>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 19:23:05 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <162300167247.22542.13551351858394953533@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 09:23:02 +1000
Cc: ops-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-httpbis-cache.all@ietf.org, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, last-call@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1BFE3FCF-D5A4-4A69-BFB5-C63B466E7A72@mnot.net>
References: <162300167247.22542.13551351858394953533@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Al Morton <acmorton@att.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.100.0.2.22)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.29; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=out5-smtp.messagingengine.com
X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=mnot@mnot.net domain=mnot.net), signature is good
X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=mnot@mnot.net domain=messagingengine.com), signature is good
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1lqOaZ-0004nI-LM 6525469a371c7c6037908a3730b5694a
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-16
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/1BFE3FCF-D5A4-4A69-BFB5-C63B466E7A72@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/38863
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Thanks for the review, Al.

> On 7 Jun 2021, at 3:47 am, Al Morton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Al Morton
> Review result: Ready
> 
> Since this review was requested with a very short deadline, it only allows for
> a "surgical" response.
> 
> This draft obsoletes RFC 7234, and Appendix B lists the changes from RFC 7234. 
> Assuming this list is complete and correct, all of the changes appear to
> improve the situation from an operational perspective, so it's good to go.
> 
> Nit:   == Unused Reference: 'RFC7234' is defined on line 1766, but no explicit
> reference was found in the text

I believe it's there because it's mentioned in the context of obsoletion (both in the Abstract and Introduction).

Cheers,


--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/