Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663)

<d.stussy@yahoo.com> Thu, 14 April 2016 21:03 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA2912E218 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 14:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.286
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.286 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD=1.63, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SocjzbBJGvAe for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 14:03:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CC2912DFD5 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 14:03:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1aqngZ-0006Fz-Iz for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 20:16:19 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1aqngZ-0006Fz-Iz@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ylafon@w3.org>) id 1aqngW-0006FG-En for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 20:16:16 +0000
Received: from raoul.w3.org ([128.30.52.128]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ylafon@w3.org>) id 1aqngV-0008Hn-E2 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 20:16:15 +0000
Received: from homard.platy.net ([80.67.176.7] helo=[192.168.1.40]) by raoul.w3.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ylafon@w3.org>) id 1aqngU-000BPJ-Ti for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 20:16:15 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Resent-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
From: d.stussy@yahoo.com
Resent-From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 18:10:08 +0000
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>, Roberto Peon <fenix@google.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Reply-To: d.stussy@yahoo.com
Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 22:16:14 +0200
Message-Id: <162094316.1891646.1460484574532.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
X-Name-Md5: efe3dad792d606410c9cc49cedaffc94
References: <162094316.1891646.1460484574532.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=1.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD=1.63, FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO=2.095, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, W3C_NW=0.5
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1aqngV-0008Hn-E2 3c002aba79e7415e07ea5bef601e5189
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/162094316.1891646.1460484574532.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/31463
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

It breaks the CGI interface, which per RFC 3875 is expecting the SERVER_PROTOCOL variable to contain "HTTP/2.0", not "HTTP/2".  It may also break any server log analysis tools which depend on the ANBF syntax as the variable may also appear in the logs.

RFC 3875, Section 4.1.16 ABNF:

   HTTP-Version      = "HTTP" "/" 1*digit "." 1*digit

The "minor" number is not optional.  If this has been changed, RFC 7540 needs to say so.  It doesn't.

Personally, I don't care if this is handled via an errata or another RFC which clarifies the conflict.

--------------------------------------------
On Tue, 4/12/16, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
I don't understand how it breaks anything: when you use HTTP/1.1, you have the minor version.  When you use HTTP/2, you're using a server that understands HTTP/2 and knows what to expect.  Please explain where the problem occurs.
...