[Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 12 April 2016 07:24 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58E312E6A4 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:24:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.917
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.917 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ITW0AQAzYDf4 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:24:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4273612E697 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:24:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1apsbx-0002Ou-FL for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:19:45 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:19:45 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1apsbx-0002Ou-FL@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>) id 1apsbt-0002O9-Jk for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:19:41 +0000
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([4.31.198.49]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>) id 1apsbr-0002pt-Jm for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:19:41 +0000
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id ED80B180204; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:19:03 -0700 (PDT)
To: mike@belshe.com, fenix@google.com, martin.thomson@gmail.com, barryleiba@computer.org, mnot@mnot.net
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: d.stussy@yahoo.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20160412071903.ED80B180204@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:19:03 -0700
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=4.31.198.49; envelope-from=wwwrun@rfc-editor.org; helo=rfc-editor.org
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=4.035, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1apsbr-0002pt-Jm 1c67ae554e64371d3034147883e3fc70
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/20160412071903.ED80B180204@rfc-editor.org>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/31423
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7540, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol Version 2 (HTTP/2)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7540&eid=4663 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: D. Stussy <d.stussy@yahoo.com> Section: 8 omits Original Text ------------- [Note: RFC 3875, section 4.1.16, defines the protocol version as: HTTP-Version = "HTTP" "/" 1*digit "." 1*digit Nothing in RFC 7540 redefines this.] Corrected Text -------------- Add paragraph at end of section 8 (before 8.1) - Clarification: HTTP/2 preserves the format of the SERVER_PROTOCOL CGI variable, both in the CGI interface and for any server logging purposes. Where a version string is necessary, it is "HTTP/2.0" as defined by RFC 3875. Notes ----- Compatibility is required with a prior published RFC, or a specific change superseding the prior RFC need be explicitly stated. This RFC states in its abstract: "This specification is an alternative to, but does not obsolete, the HTTP/1.1 message syntax. HTTP's existing semantics remain unchanged" RFC 7540, section 3.5's connection preface string containing "HTTP/2.0" implies that the RFC authors should have forseen this issue, and added a paragraph to section 8 to explicitly state no change in the CGI interface variable SERVER_PROTOCOL was desired. At least one implementation is using a version string of "HTTP/2", not "HTTP/2.0", because of how it is referred in this RFC. ("nghttp2.org" has incorrectly implemented this in its library routines.) Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7540 (draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-17) -------------------------------------- Title : Hypertext Transfer Protocol Version 2 (HTTP/2) Publication Date : May 2015 Author(s) : M. Belshe, R. Peon, M. Thomson, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis APP Area : Applications Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663) Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663) Barry Leiba
- RE: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663) Mike Bishop
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663) Barry Leiba
- RE: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663) Mike Bishop
- RE: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663) Mike Bishop
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663) Barry Leiba
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663) Stefan Eissing
- Re: [Moderator Action] [Technical Errata Reported… d.stussy
- RE: [Moderator Action] [Technical Errata Reported… d.stussy
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663) d.stussy
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663) Willy Tarreau
- Re: [Moderator Action] [Technical Errata Reported… Julian Reschke
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663) Mark Nottingham