Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints-02

Wesley Oliver <wesley.olis@gmail.com> Thu, 18 May 2017 05:31 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5799412EB80 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 May 2017 22:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uq3hYay-B68e for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 May 2017 22:31:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65F9012E056 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 17 May 2017 22:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1dBDuU-0004SL-J4 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 05:23:38 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 05:23:38 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1dBDuU-0004SL-J4@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <wesley.olis@gmail.com>) id 1dBDuQ-0004Pk-Ft for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 05:23:34 +0000
Received: from mail-qk0-f173.google.com ([209.85.220.173]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <wesley.olis@gmail.com>) id 1dBDuH-0005R3-G2 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 05:23:29 +0000
Received: by mail-qk0-f173.google.com with SMTP id a72so27295084qkj.2 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 17 May 2017 22:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=vyASwcjtT9EQYNv33pIqU6xQyViALOyha3me63DEtzE=; b=N+M7sUa34RfQBk4QKnzd5kZ45mhiwMqtXjfEEaSThSr5XdH2lLClZr5k8uQ/mKRtpN GtH4vjMfFzeVhP4B7Is8S/PdTICuUs6kekNLRicVAUXrgZKD268U3loYh+OT4iZNLQKL wnK7wrJ/D7WRGawdJNk5Qy7YnUV0gukCrppMSOu5CqbGQt8r3nOl1WoiQcU8crOdvpX7 2rBeeRKIxbgNrK6bOpkz3hoj9qGusd+t8DeUcOIVVRNGcOkfF1OIimvNrDpsSg2D0WDA EflFR2bJ/UCUg8AFL8aFm8FfpYOQtLYaC8Jg1/4FXHwjsmyqZ8v6XPVjSeZCmFzJSvY1 i3HA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vyASwcjtT9EQYNv33pIqU6xQyViALOyha3me63DEtzE=; b=ieD3tVhQsj/3n1ps3H1Kdyb4GknXkP8dry+F6uuDDHSj4B5K2D7f8S2kNKGcTrQleQ 1icui1JI9Hs3YB6fRzyX55ltLE4YAVFpyEslb6SwCRArv+/g8nL1T2BonZCdQBGDPlzL 2zIdz2rFemc1KFNCHIoSAoYfYmRF0ls+41kek2TpMcVD4IMHBM6DhTdva5I0p8OHLcH9 53SlGzRMYt4waun0o4FSy19RdnPpv1/4OQ3zJYc8N8XzXMPoHiRf5qLwtMNRkTl9blTK ufmBiKMJODD8ElYkMGm5WhmGlPderhdhsbn8NgUd6xphDdN+hSOYvagnjNMc3HLo3yLd PKNQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCBeCDwXTlv4y6gNIp8/KYekzw8u/dehX+EWS7GnPYvigR49pJr 5OBFArpaNpGP5P+AG676VvcH/77MeA==
X-Received: by 10.55.158.16 with SMTP id h16mr1962984qke.300.1495084979126; Wed, 17 May 2017 22:22:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.142.69 with HTTP; Wed, 17 May 2017 22:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20170518044838.GB20334@1wt.eu>
References: <42532309-F4FA-4007-8639-04B90743DFFE@mnot.net> <CANatvzy99cHoUyjHMD+m5mMwFn4OnepGDWSQZKv5b4P+bNzedQ@mail.gmail.com> <20170518044838.GB20334@1wt.eu>
From: Wesley Oliver <wesley.olis@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 07:22:58 +0200
Message-ID: <CACvHZ2YhbrxFuY=ABb5o4B+k2q5UPw7Qb4hG-kB_DR10Qtga-g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114d318e1705d5054fc59926"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.220.173; envelope-from=wesley.olis@gmail.com; helo=mail-qk0-f173.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1dBDuH-0005R3-G2 8044e94ca9a242afeb715a482050f46a
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints-02
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CACvHZ2YhbrxFuY=ABb5o4B+k2q5UPw7Qb4hG-kB_DR10Qtga-g@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33937
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi,

Bit late to the part once again.

Did any one consider, an external reference to preload resource manifest,
which just contains a list of preloaded resources.
The main difference is it is not inline, but external reference resource.
this external reference resource could then be pushed
via http 2.0 to the client, after which it can get to work. Obviously this
would not work with http 1.1 though,
so current solution proposed would be a better than this.

Kind Regards,

Wesley Oliver




On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 6:48 AM, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:

> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 11:22:02AM +0900, Kazuho Oku wrote:
> > 2017-05-18 10:22 GMT+09:00 Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>:
> > > Kazuho has indicated that he thinks this draft is ready for WGLC, and
> we have no open issues.
> > >
> > > Please have a look at:
> > >   https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints-02
> > > .. and raise any issues you see here or on the issues list. Statements
> of support / intent to implement would also be helpful.
> > >
> > > WGLC will end in two weeks, on 1 June 2017.
> >
> > Thank you for changing the state to WGLC.
> >
> > The only change that was made in the -02 draft (which was submitted on
> > Tuesday) is editorial improvements from Mark. I would appreciate it if
> > you could take a look. IMO the text is much clear and concise than
> > -01.
>
> It looks pretty good to me. I just think that one example could have been
> nice (since not everybody is familiar with informational responses), to
> make it visually clear that you can get one or a few 103 prior to a 200
> for a single request.
>
> I expect it to work out of the box through haproxy, and in general I intend
> to make sure it will.
>
> Regards,
> Willy
>
>


-- 
-- 
Web Site that I have developed:
http://www.swimdynamics.co.za


Skype: wezley_oliver
MSN messenger: wesley.olis@gmail.com