Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints-02

[Kazuho Oku <[e-mail]>]

2017-05-18 13:48 GMT+09:00 Willy Tarreau <[e-mail]>:
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 11:22:02AM +0900, Kazuho Oku wrote:
>> 2017-05-18 10:22 GMT+09:00 Mark Nottingham <[e-mail]>:
>> > Kazuho has indicated that he thinks this draft is ready for WGLC, and we have no open issues.
>> >
>> > Please have a look at:
>> >   https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints-02
>> > .. and raise any issues you see here or on the issues list. Statements of support / intent to implement would also be helpful.
>> >
>> > WGLC will end in two weeks, on 1 June 2017.
>>
>> Thank you for changing the state to WGLC.
>>
>> The only change that was made in the -02 draft (which was submitted on
>> Tuesday) is editorial improvements from Mark. I would appreciate it if
>> you could take a look. IMO the text is much clear and concise than
>> -01.
>
> It looks pretty good to me. I just think that one example could have been
> nice (since not everybody is familiar with informational responses), to
> make it visually clear that you can get one or a few 103 prior to a 200
> for a single request.

Hi Willy,

That sounds like a good idea!

I've created a PR adding such an example.
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/354

Please let me know what you think.

Thank you in advance.

>
> I expect it to work out of the box through haproxy, and in general I intend
> to make sure it will.
>
> Regards,
> Willy



-- 
Kazuho Oku