IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 05 October 2016 12:37 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F921296C3 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 05:37:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.917
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.917 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9QFKleRdcqdy for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 05:37:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 316891296AD for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 05:37:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1brlNR-0004lw-Vy for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 12:32:50 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 12:32:49 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1brlNR-0004lw-Vy@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1brlNP-0004lA-3d for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 12:32:47 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1brlNH-00052v-6b for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 12:32:46 +0000
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([93.217.110.53]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MOkQc-1bmnYW3VVm-0065Fe; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 14:32:06 +0200
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
References: <20161004160321.DFB4C111E5@welho-filter1.welho.com> <BN6PR03MB27082C2CF4DC3F8F82354FDE87C50@BN6PR03MB2708.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CABkgnnXmT1rHczFmTS3W8Cg7k8H6XvpykniV3ZXqpR__9ahkvA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Kari hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>, HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <597bf038-a347-8419-ccc0-01e9d3602c63@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 14:32:07 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnXmT1rHczFmTS3W8Cg7k8H6XvpykniV3ZXqpR__9ahkvA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:kJsyjTxUKqD7siRuYrtjxcY2YtyVx5IoELIqLd6CYVxBaq4Sy7N p0zCVu9B+URnUMU9fRc6EnBdTawIVbDUTms3eYfzBRXRgzkilOzu92xP3UeXGXgmvJq0Ugz 3fyeedccuEml1hGRkdGc8bQCw13k1HDjBTk92CvD2tdAmV3AKdnAIM/6zeeBGVELJFnf3jw E2C7x81mRVEsk9Cq7fXgw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:cSNzL4vOfc8=:xyXmd0lgVvFpPYPvuFw7Da 4g6qyY/zbC14plCuDgm4yDgb+enCosG/qLe7OfkkeYL0mR9BmoLninkfF6+knS5CiHacmbJwN cumshM8EVZlugv9OS7cts5Ha2Pd1lNuSHxnfnyi/kwVxXHcGWm3h7kVVLGMkFjiyevmbh8sFT BC70iuC2gLkMDt7HgKKEA/a+pw8CyiPQwTUNVtDuzJj/uuojsuQEzoFk69s1JdQdjUJt/6JFC hgYcbFVjiJKRpbHhX7qyGYQCirnlAZ2Bif+8oRPoSSdCoA9x8A++E/P1dUcD0PVwEqiUtPqA8 JBzA5LuuLg+H/jqxN49mSOZqwPGDGDbskT3V2FE/dG15zH/bwurdKdRG/p4rz0y1GvOM8VCmt NtCj2NpaPKtYElhSFRrEuWoyLCNJ2rguWviYRxBP5j++EvSxDlEk6Le6cGSRooqqLZslOLQb1 lQOztMX9+MzMbfqY0aYzH9OtuxvJFbIwYeLFHlmWZBLZ8DtQzd11jW1VyOLh9U1OfvAkONx+U zHyjw07UpttYTtjcc2eZNI/QhfJrm2N0erEjp+D1nF0jdDck97hIAQol/PxgmahDEg3vqB/ec gD+eFyHtK3XkXAaj2uGCXVECyyoihJi4dNBrbDGgARs/8VALf0tgwgXnKLfbSAvHqGdBIzVbL 5TyWIFhkEeffTe/IJJwcYshx4TuVOQ4YBA5jVNacfhONHdWqJEs5h36mYGqXfkl4ctNzIrmyG 6Rx1zoh51QreSKrdMXfRp77ZS8xV2BN+6EH+0BAWKPethL90QFmHjYiGiHpRjkRXh7HVG47Qd Kz1TFA5
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.22; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.422, BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1brlNH-00052v-6b 0f7c6b7c7f54611eb6d4150ac7f4a147
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/597bf038-a347-8419-ccc0-01e9d3602c63@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32482
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2016-10-05 14:22, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 5 October 2016 at 04:38, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> wrote:
>> Should we just define SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED and call it a day?
>
> I believe that Julian was the one that observed that h2 isn't any more
> special than http/1.1 here.  Julian?
>
> FWIW, I can live with this.  It's certainly a LOT simpler.  Only
> servers with modern stacks are going to handle this properly, and
> coupling it to h2 doesn't hurt that much.

I have to admit that I'm not up-to-date with respect to this spec.

That said, if the spec can be made simpler by just treating HTTP/1.1 and 
HTTP/2 the same this sounds like a win to me.

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email