IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-httpbis-grease-00.txt

Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com> Fri, 25 May 2018 00:32 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E997C12EA62 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 May 2018 17:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.661
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.661 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sendgrid.me
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jvzE_aDCHw_g for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 May 2018 17:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 246C112D7F1 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 24 May 2018 17:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1fM0Xd-0005yz-R4 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 25 May 2018 00:25:09 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 00:25:09 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1fM0Xd-0005yz-R4@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <bounces+1568871-208f-ietf-http-wg=w3.org@sendgrid.net>) id 1fM0XG-0004Mx-J5 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 25 May 2018 00:24:46 +0000
Received: from o1.31pqt.s2shared.sendgrid.net ([167.89.100.227]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <bounces+1568871-208f-ietf-http-wg=w3.org@sendgrid.net>) id 1fM0XA-0006nz-6h for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 25 May 2018 00:24:44 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sendgrid.me; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:subject:to:cc:content-type; s=smtpapi; bh=hCdPA1tvtZiBhsVXyXxZA+2wzkI=; b=V+ZgFxZeTGHZWCYPMy rsKIA2sqcyF8RBKmSPXd59KncMplc5B95/sRqQnBgT+F0ve5v8z0y8LDiN++dmHI HqBAWQxglSLWkN2Fk5QxGhWWBk/3cFiEUxVo9P8igLUDk4bmqWwK0cRXs+UwxG1E OEG3cIzTlrO3cGeiUk0uP9Nhk=
Received: by filter0027p3iad2.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0027p3iad2-2641-5B0757B0-73 2018-05-25 00:24:16.917963369 +0000 UTC
Received: from mail-oi0-f45.google.com (mail-oi0-f45.google.com [209.85.218.45]) by ismtpd0009p1las1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id rdeq5mrWQ7e1Fn9vMBHMag for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 25 May 2018 00:24:16.553 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oi0-f45.google.com with SMTP id y15-v6so3095996oia.13 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 24 May 2018 17:24:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwehwesU44sSxa0tlhWWakfflwqKyosxA5EBVo6KwDTv26F9idHk kM4ocNmrCsJktms3DPHT/FYf+hagnVKdSCSp2DI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKLBJD2bLewKJ3PsrWglQX4nDJzOk6ahL9VId36ntjTDO+O/tgJvcbRj/bWkah/u57bs8mN/it9x1+Z7ZO+giF8=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:ad3:: with SMTP id k80-v6mr93390oiy.132.1527207855620; Thu, 24 May 2018 17:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a4a:8a24:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 24 May 2018 17:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnW0hzXuzty+T56U7jXyWpZz3yEb8h5hZAKMifjcw35KAw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <152719864878.5254.2880015600388829691.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <SN1PR08MB1854A7B3107595838D677F90DA6A0@SN1PR08MB1854.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <CAOdDvNpp-fJW-gbvoj9nqptWWfUq+DWBg7=f5MFLvPN8ej6SkA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnW0hzXuzty+T56U7jXyWpZz3yEb8h5hZAKMifjcw35KAw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 00:24:16 +0000
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAOdDvNoR1okh_zQ7g1SO0+smEfs6CJZmtR-ab1xMQd1Q9TaSnA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAOdDvNoR1okh_zQ7g1SO0+smEfs6CJZmtR-ab1xMQd1Q9TaSnA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>, Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bb8be9056cfcc95f"
X-SG-EID: YLWet4rakcOTMHWvPPwWbcsiUJbN1FCn0PHYd/Uujh5SAryYtGx3iJWtiJc6XBiKMRKoDQuUDxhLzo wbfo6blurdJ9x0z5na/o/GHi9zBeWy7wuc293+zXmVJ0GbILrws+PhQNfVqn3vc+2drYA7euhsqHpO StwfqBH8wotF4AAOtNl+0vRUuGKc+tWLellMQHfMmr1JszU8ia6abhq7yuXW8aa8uUFWh4bDMLVyqw 8=
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.404, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.799, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1fM0XA-0006nz-6h e6a620aad42f0bbfbc9e8990d2535d09
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-httpbis-grease-00.txt
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CAOdDvNoR1okh_zQ7g1SO0+smEfs6CJZmtR-ab1xMQd1Q9TaSnA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/35443
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I said its probably _not_ too late for h2 :)

(I'm just contrasting that with its definitely not too late for hq - mike
had suggesting gating hq grease on h2 grease and that doesn't seem
necessary to me.)



On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 8:04 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 9:44 AM Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
> wrote:
> > Its probably not too late for h2,
>
> Can I infer from this that you think that the ORIGIN frame will cause
> things to break?  Or is your assertion that servers are the broken ones?
>
> Either way, I'm inclined to do this for h2.  There's a cost in bustage that
> we pay, but the payoff might be that we can use new frame types.
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email