IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-httpbis-grease-00.txt

Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com> Thu, 24 May 2018 23:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1E7412D574 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 May 2018 16:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.661
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.661 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sendgrid.me
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uoNaBC6eo0ko for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 May 2018 16:43:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32A401275FD for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 24 May 2018 16:43:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1fLzme-0008BF-7Q for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 24 May 2018 23:36:36 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 23:36:36 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1fLzme-0008BF-7Q@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <bounces+1568871-208f-ietf-http-wg=w3.org@sendgrid.net>) id 1fLzmS-0008AR-Qv for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 24 May 2018 23:36:24 +0000
Received: from o1.31pqt.s2shared.sendgrid.net ([167.89.100.227]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <bounces+1568871-208f-ietf-http-wg=w3.org@sendgrid.net>) id 1fLzmM-00056U-NY for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 24 May 2018 23:36:23 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sendgrid.me; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:subject:to:cc:content-type; s=smtpapi; bh=1qJNl03GnRVJKOIQbbFbzVLWF6g=; b=oqb2+UzTVFWb9L4ABW MtPoW5Kk5upvnHvksbQrkZ9vt10nJAqrvNPe5b5ir4a+rO25o5HOeB9rzENyYoMl SDb1kgQiBpljdt6EAAqTCS5s3WRnhKWXR/QQPcxHEUmecWAo+46KC/lE/SJGYwp+ HBW/YPX1zHwQqntM2UyDQx/gI=
Received: by filter0027p3iad2.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0027p3iad2-2641-5B074C59-63 2018-05-24 23:35:53.819116872 +0000 UTC
Received: from mail-ot0-f170.google.com (mail-ot0-f170.google.com [74.125.82.170]) by ismtpd0001p1las1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id QmoMgtAlQpK7gOaT4tiqDg for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 24 May 2018 23:35:53.415 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ot0-f170.google.com with SMTP id h8-v6so4042800otb.2 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 24 May 2018 16:35:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwfKBVVXMChYgEsgZPxpGBdBrSsCGq/HjCXSZaeh/mvBkQxZqinZ hHpSBqKGDuE/zs1QtmxJsfrI9xz0ClfXQTUxjN4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKIq/SMPK+6wa46+9p+DlTIJH/u6FqiWeDaSSaGQFSnlCFNnAfptMZcAk4cAyfQs+qSNcp4rXx81cb/IlNTLXP4=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:1ba8:: with SMTP id z37-v6mr31319otd.85.1527204952501; Thu, 24 May 2018 16:35:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a4a:8a24:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 24 May 2018 16:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <SN1PR08MB1854A7B3107595838D677F90DA6A0@SN1PR08MB1854.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
References: <152719864878.5254.2880015600388829691.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <SN1PR08MB1854A7B3107595838D677F90DA6A0@SN1PR08MB1854.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
From: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 23:35:53 +0000
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAOdDvNpp-fJW-gbvoj9nqptWWfUq+DWBg7=f5MFLvPN8ej6SkA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAOdDvNpp-fJW-gbvoj9nqptWWfUq+DWBg7=f5MFLvPN8ej6SkA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b17329056cfc1c65"
X-SG-EID: YLWet4rakcOTMHWvPPwWbcsiUJbN1FCn0PHYd/Uujh7iAG6LZODf7TjukrAoCKSCGQGO68scrgcnF4 CJ082jXeqCRxdTcmBT1CogH5qfxn+MC1dkSx11CFRW5mD8mPdRWB1tvCIoghGvBiMeV908Wf313SUB d4kYZphpgah7autfy0rpzqkyxLpaU21skPJCNegi6b0ew3fV1xL9oVO5rCfWfSerkQkU/hS5kttnKS 0=
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.628, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.799, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1fLzmM-00056U-NY a3ed86ba902046664dd0659df437ba1f
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-httpbis-grease-00.txt
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CAOdDvNpp-fJW-gbvoj9nqptWWfUq+DWBg7=f5MFLvPN8ej6SkA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/35441
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 5:54 PM, Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be> wrote:

> There was a recent incident with a peer which closed the connection on an
> unknown setting, and that has given rise to some discussion about greasing
> HTTP/2's extension mechanisms (frame types and settings).  This draft is a
> quick proposal to do just that; if it gets traction on the HTTP/2 side,
> I'll put the same requirements into the HTTP/QUIC spec.
>

I strongly support you putting these requirements into hq independently of
whether this is something we take up for h2.

My only concern about h2 is the lack of a time machine. Doing this now
could result in breakage (hopefully I'm wrong - but its possible) rather
than be preventative (i.e. grease). Its probably not too late for h2, but
its definitely not too late for hq!

-P




>
> Comments welcome.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2018 2:51 PM
> To: Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be>
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-httpbis-grease-00.txt
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-bishop-httpbis-grease-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Mike Bishop and posted to the IETF
> repository.
>
> Name:           draft-bishop-httpbis-grease
> Revision:       00
> Title:          GREASE for HTTP/2
> Document date:  2018-05-24
> Group:          Individual Submission
> Pages:          4
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bishop-httpbis-
> grease-00.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bishop-httpbis-
> grease/
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bishop-httpbis-grease-00
> Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/
> doc/html/draft-bishop-httpbis-grease
>
>
> Abstract:
>    Reserves several values in the HTTP/2 registries to exercise the
>    requirement that clients and servers ignore unknown values.
>
>
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at
> tools.ietf.org.
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email