Re: HTTP/2 in Apache Traffic Server (proxy server / cache)
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Wed, 01 April 2015 04:19 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F9D1A876E for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 21:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O9Q2jQb221a4 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 21:19:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4623F1A876B for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 21:19:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1YdA48-0006Qf-6D for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 04:15:44 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 04:15:44 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1YdA48-0006Qf-6D@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1YdA45-0006Pp-32 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 04:15:41 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1YdA41-0000Zv-Vs for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 04:15:41 +0000
Received: from [192.168.0.16] (unknown [120.149.147.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 423A822E25F; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 00:15:11 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <551B6D10.3080801@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 15:15:08 +1100
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FCD73DA0-CCED-4E18-A9AB-D5E79DECB81B@mnot.net>
References: <62032E45-E9B1-4AE6-885F-0BFB23006A4D@ogre.com> <E22C44C7-9584-4CDA-AD1F-CA55D518B431@mnot.net> <CAP+FsNchHzBhzKoO99MfSQ=tN5EaQxPB52aQYrM+EY1wZLQ77Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ_4DfTJN5nO1xKt+6wC0UQm6wHvcVgmhrPkX6KnX2kPBfEZAQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAH_y2NGr9LaKdJy_g0F9NWGyb66XtE2+bSoD-aXdrH60KwSnEA@mail.gmail.com> <551B6D10.3080801@treenet.co.nz>
To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.200, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1YdA41-0000Zv-Vs 680a8fa338e4f12eda7d85e2b87eae9b
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: HTTP/2 in Apache Traffic Server (proxy server / cache)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/FCD73DA0-CCED-4E18-A9AB-D5E79DECB81B@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/29162
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
I’m neutral on alphabetical order; people can search for a specific implementation in the table easily. What I’d like to do is switch the “draft support” column to “advertised version(s)”, but that would mean everyone would need to fill out their implementation status again — anyone mind? Moving old implementations to a separate table makes sense; I’ve just done so for everything older than -12. > On 1 Apr 2015, at 2:59 pm, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote: > > On 1/04/2015 12:02 p.m., Greg Wilkins wrote: >> That wiki list is getting a bit long and hard to find particular servers as >> the order appears random (or is that in order implemented). >> Anybody mind if I put it into alphabetical order? > > Can we please drop the implementations that dont support latest > implementation+ draft(s) down to the bottom or an appendix table? > > Amos > > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
- HTTP/2 in Apache Traffic Server (proxy server / c… Leif Hedstrom
- Re: HTTP/2 in Apache Traffic Server (proxy server… Mark Nottingham
- Re: HTTP/2 in Apache Traffic Server (proxy server… Roberto Peon
- Re: HTTP/2 in Apache Traffic Server (proxy server… Ryan Hamilton
- Re: HTTP/2 in Apache Traffic Server (proxy server… Greg Wilkins
- Re: HTTP/2 in Apache Traffic Server (proxy server… Amos Jeffries
- Re: HTTP/2 in Apache Traffic Server (proxy server… Mark Nottingham
- Re: HTTP/2 in Apache Traffic Server (proxy server… Cory Benfield
- Re: HTTP/2 in Apache Traffic Server (proxy server… Simpson, Robby (GE Energy Management)
- Re: HTTP/2 in Apache Traffic Server (proxy server… Stefan Eissing