Re: HTTP/2 in Apache Traffic Server (proxy server / cache)

Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> Wed, 01 April 2015 04:02 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759D31A854B for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 21:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dz-j83NC8Ujt for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 21:02:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FE921A7002 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 21:02:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1Yd9oe-0000p6-38 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 03:59:44 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 03:59:44 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1Yd9oe-0000p6-38@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1Yd9oc-0000oI-7i for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 03:59:42 +0000
Received: from 121-99-228-82.static.orcon.net.nz ([121.99.228.82] helo=treenet.co.nz) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1Yd9ob-00007d-Bl for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 03:59:42 +0000
Received: from [192.168.20.12] (121-99-25-188.bng1.nct.orcon.net.nz [121.99.25.188]) by treenet.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3523E6F12 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 15:59:14 +1200 (NZST)
Message-ID: <551B6D10.3080801@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 16:59:12 +1300
From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <62032E45-E9B1-4AE6-885F-0BFB23006A4D@ogre.com> <E22C44C7-9584-4CDA-AD1F-CA55D518B431@mnot.net> <CAP+FsNchHzBhzKoO99MfSQ=tN5EaQxPB52aQYrM+EY1wZLQ77Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ_4DfTJN5nO1xKt+6wC0UQm6wHvcVgmhrPkX6KnX2kPBfEZAQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAH_y2NGr9LaKdJy_g0F9NWGyb66XtE2+bSoD-aXdrH60KwSnEA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH_y2NGr9LaKdJy_g0F9NWGyb66XtE2+bSoD-aXdrH60KwSnEA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=121.99.228.82; envelope-from=squid3@treenet.co.nz; helo=treenet.co.nz
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.452, BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TVD_RCVD_IP=0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1Yd9ob-00007d-Bl 24c68c988ce0da790d10d80873c9fcb8
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: HTTP/2 in Apache Traffic Server (proxy server / cache)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/551B6D10.3080801@treenet.co.nz>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/29160
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 1/04/2015 12:02 p.m., Greg Wilkins wrote:
> That wiki list is getting a bit long and hard to find particular servers as
> the order appears random (or is that in order implemented).
> Anybody mind if I put it into alphabetical order?

Can we please drop the implementations that dont support latest
implementation+ draft(s) down to the bottom or an appendix table?

Amos