[Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4720)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 27 June 2016 06:51 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D607312B01D for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 23:51:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BwKoyhIQInQ1 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 23:51:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3305B12B00A for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 23:51:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1bHQJy-0003uZ-Ir for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 06:47:02 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 06:47:02 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1bHQJy-0003uZ-Ir@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>) id 1bHQJt-0003tq-LK for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 06:46:57 +0000
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([4.31.198.49]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>) id 1bHQJp-0002sI-C3 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 06:46:55 +0000
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id E9A8FB80D5F; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 23:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
To: mike@belshe.com, fenix@google.com, martin.thomson@gmail.com, ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, mnot@mnot.net
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: kazu@iij.ad.jp, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20160627064625.E9A8FB80D5F@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 23:46:25 -0700
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=4.31.198.49; envelope-from=wwwrun@rfc-editor.org; helo=rfc-editor.org
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.282, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.974, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1bHQJp-0002sI-C3 ecf638473c90826e5facabeb1df97a3e
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4720)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/20160627064625.E9A8FB80D5F@rfc-editor.org>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/31795
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7540, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol Version 2 (HTTP/2)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7540&eid=4720 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Kazu Yamamoto <kazu@iij.ad.jp> Section: 8.2.1 Original Text ------------- Pushed responses are always associated with an explicit request from the client. The PUSH_PROMISE frames sent by the server are sent on that explicit request's stream. Corrected Text -------------- Promised requests are always associated with an explicit request from the client. The PUSH_PROMISE frames sent by the server are sent on that explicit request's stream. Notes ----- This section talks about promised requests, not pushed responses. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7540 (draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-17) -------------------------------------- Title : Hypertext Transfer Protocol Version 2 (HTTP/2) Publication Date : May 2015 Author(s) : M. Belshe, R. Peon, M. Thomson, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis APP Area : Applications Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4720) RFC Errata System
- [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7540 (4720) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4720) Mark Nottingham
- RE: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4720) Mike Bishop
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4720) Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4720) Martin Thomson
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4720) Ben Campbell
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4720) Mark Nottingham