Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4720)

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Sun, 31 July 2016 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D2B912D0D8 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 14:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.307
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.307 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZLIZaw4s2ngq for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 14:35:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38F6F12B02B for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 14:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1bTyK7-0003sY-1F for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 21:31:03 +0000
Resent-Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 21:31:03 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1bTyK7-0003sY-1F@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1bTyJy-0003qw-VB for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 21:30:54 +0000
Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com ([74.125.82.50]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1bTyJw-0000W4-Lv for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 21:30:54 +0000
Received: by mail-wm0-f50.google.com with SMTP id f65so348270733wmi.0 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 14:30:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=aFt8WvtFvqAC64xETcPK1JUutgXNyH7xlq9toFUEGDw=; b=Fb4m2fVPIOvPuDusAupSihLjtq6rnjBX+GrETR1ujf+VlhbfNqung2wkTUFrMYZk91 /ugo5zVFQ7hGBiC4jujYRrtXrWqAQOZUElz4e22MEHHeShPn3AXn8UQZ9EEml2O5+i32 0PPtI9e3aziJ5LQv9n60Y6JeKoMVGGlXEX+i/T9K5k0ya+O2DIOsEadxdjf8Dp70q/Yz fH11jzxgLltHL6EMEvCO0u0mIRf5aDgHLxL06ciX/cfVKXWo6v2JVcQYotA4upswfC4d w3x5OQFjJiz1fb9NfOnyUpicStHpqxQN0qyEggIdFdxuN/jji+h2mm6e2/G2jic6XTng UR8A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aFt8WvtFvqAC64xETcPK1JUutgXNyH7xlq9toFUEGDw=; b=kZeLqTayVP6JVaEKtYvWwIRoeRns8asnNA+lOYBzF+lJjcZ1HXsXAaNJMyEdabvWQA hLJPDIcleZe7bnjgwPjrHEdqiZwdxqy3+OahE0QJr/Hy1KEO4va0R7M8CgRxMAzBei+H ahLt6DN5OMHjG/98Hpabr+tMBbLaF/1Bsh2aWiLFJ1cqFrcbWKZNkHauwp8AWDR7IPb2 QlztD7846wzIIdfrz0bYpHW8cB/hJLseXHtkOEoIQmajDwuz2QxFDWKdIzoymLYntshZ M44TMGWGnz98ScNgSSkX3vjXGQGVBmaPZDjYx0I3d/vVw/WK0BXubhgug9/R8HIuGJPG i50Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoout9cFdPJJlj0Ze2EY4rIiI75mpwTSal0TyfzFsGIWDxFRciMiymssn8SK4hhsgR3Ey5Sae1pY+9pYRHZw==
X-Received: by 10.194.47.206 with SMTP id f14mr51596750wjn.98.1470000626145; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 14:30:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.167.150 with HTTP; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 14:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.28.167.150 with HTTP; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 14:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <E239B15B-6090-43F5-A34A-FE78D83633C3@mnot.net>
References: <20160627064625.E9A8FB80D5F@rfc-editor.org> <83C394C7-A6CC-4338-ADFE-0E4132A080CC@mnot.net> <345FB8F4-D22A-405B-A3CF-3A99A5F4705D@nostrum.com> <E239B15B-6090-43F5-A34A-FE78D83633C3@mnot.net>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 23:30:24 +0200
Message-ID: <CABkgnnX8UNrhsarGunqTKJBU2wh7W_=mWULxP1Fz1K_ws4Qn+g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Kazu Yamamoto <kazu@iij.ad.jp>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, fenix@google.com, alissa@cooperw.in, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, "Mike Belshe >" <mike@belshe.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b86e4f824205c0538f5314e"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=74.125.82.50; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm0-f50.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.707, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1bTyJw-0000W4-Lv 960228bbace1b161cc7448990ee7daec
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4720)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnX8UNrhsarGunqTKJBU2wh7W_=mWULxP1Fz1K_ws4Qn+g@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32105
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

It is - in my view - ok in the original, but much more precise in the
revised/proposed form.

On 29 Jul 2016 12:27 AM, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> I *think* the clear intent is as is suggested, and it was just an
> editorial slip. Martin?
>
> > On 28 Jul 2016, at 4:25 PM, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:
> >
> > Is this really just editorial?
> >
> > On 28 Jul 2016, at 8:59, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> >
> >> I think this is APPROVE.
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 27 Jun 2016, at 8:46 AM, RFC Errata System <
> rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7540,
> >>> "Hypertext Transfer Protocol Version 2 (HTTP/2)".
> >>>
> >>> --------------------------------------
> >>> You may review the report below and at:
> >>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7540&eid=4720
> >>>
> >>> --------------------------------------
> >>> Type: Editorial
> >>> Reported by: Kazu Yamamoto <kazu@iij.ad.jp>
> >>>
> >>> Section: 8.2.1
> >>>
> >>> Original Text
> >>> -------------
> >>> Pushed responses are always associated with an explicit request from
> >>> the client.  The PUSH_PROMISE frames sent by the server are sent on
> >>> that explicit request's stream.
> >>>
> >>> Corrected Text
> >>> --------------
> >>> Promised requests are always associated with an explicit request from
> >>> the client.  The PUSH_PROMISE frames sent by the server are sent on
> >>> that explicit request's stream.
> >>>
> >>> Notes
> >>> -----
> >>> This section talks about promised requests, not pushed responses.
> >>>
> >>> Instructions:
> >>> -------------
> >>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> >>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> >>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> >>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> >>>
> >>> --------------------------------------
> >>> RFC7540 (draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-17)
> >>> --------------------------------------
> >>> Title               : Hypertext Transfer Protocol Version 2 (HTTP/2)
> >>> Publication Date    : May 2015
> >>> Author(s)           : M. Belshe, R. Peon, M. Thomson, Ed.
> >>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> >>> Source              : Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis APP
> >>> Area                : Applications
> >>> Stream              : IETF
> >>> Verifying Party     : IESG
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
>
>