IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP Authentication

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Tue, 01 May 2012 00:59 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8498521E8122 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:59:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.364, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CXCkMqAuOHue for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA84B21E8121 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1SP1PZ-0004k3-Pa for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 01 May 2012 00:57:49 +0000
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1SP1PQ-0004jE-9n for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 01 May 2012 00:57:40 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1SP1PM-0001P2-Ei for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 01 May 2012 00:57:38 +0000
Received: from l6hmfvk1.rackspace.corp (unknown [69.20.3.135]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C53A422E1EB; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 20:57:14 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <B11765B89737A7498AF63EA84EC9F577014C8B6C@ftrdmel1>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 10:57:10 +1000
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D159EF0F-AEEC-4629-91EC-C6B0A9BEA9EE@mnot.net>
References: <14A09626-8397-4656-A042-FEFDDD017C9F@mnot.net> <B11765B89737A7498AF63EA84EC9F577014C8B6C@ftrdmel1>
To: lionel.morand@orange.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1SP1PM-0001P2-Ei 97e67ae54e72632bdc67d1f01dfc5bf5
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP Authentication
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/D159EF0F-AEEC-4629-91EC-C6B0A9BEA9EE@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/13500
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Resent-Message-Id: <E1SP1PZ-0004k3-Pa@frink.w3.org>
Resent-Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 00:57:49 +0000

Hi Lionel,

Do you know of any use outside of a mobile context? If there's interest, we can certainly look at it, but if it's relegated to just that market (whether or technical or social reasons), I don't think this would necessarily be the right place to advance it to a standard (speaking just for me).

Cheers,


On 01/05/2012, at 3:02 AM, <lionel.morand@orange.com> <lionel.morand@orange.com> wrote:

> Any feedback?
> 
> Lionel
> 
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : MORAND Lionel RD-CORE-ISS 
> Envoyé : vendredi 27 avril 2012 11:54
> À : 'Mark Nottingham'; 'HTTP Working Group'
> Objet : RE: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP Authentication
> 
> Hi,
> 
> RFC 3310 is informational but used in mobile networks. I think it is worth to consider the interest of defining this mechanism as "standard" HTTP authentication scheme. What should be the process?
> 
> In the same line, I have a draft on adaption of RFC3310 for 2G AKA (see. http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-morand-http-digest-2g-aka-02.txt). I would propose to add it to the list of new potential authentication schemes but only if RFC 3310 is part of the same list. Otherwise, it could be only informal.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Lionel 
> 
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Mark Nottingham [mailto:mnot@mnot.net] 
> Envoyé : vendredi 27 avril 2012 07:28
> À : HTTP Working Group
> Objet : Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and HTTP Authentication
> 
> Just a reminder that we're still accepting proposals for:
> 
> 1. HTTP/2.0
> 2. New HTTP authentication schemes
> 
> As per our charter <http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/charter/>.
> 
> So far, we've received the following proposals applicable to HTTP/2.0:
>  <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/wiki/Http2Proposals>
> 
> But none yet for authentication schemes:
>  <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/wiki/HttpAuthProposals>
> 
> As communicated in Paris, the deadline for proposals is 15 June, 2012. It's fine if your proposal isn't complete, but we do need to have a  good sense of it by then, for discussion.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
> 
> 
> 
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email