Re: A fresh stale response
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 13 May 2016 00:38 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E402912B011 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 May 2016 17:38:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.017
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.017 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DS9wUkDcFFBq for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 May 2016 17:38:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80BA812B00F for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 12 May 2016 17:38:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1b113m-0002A4-CC for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 13 May 2016 00:34:30 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 00:34:30 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1b113m-0002A4-CC@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1b113h-00029E-Np for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 13 May 2016 00:34:25 +0000
Received: from mail-ig0-f177.google.com ([209.85.213.177]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1b113e-0007pw-QU for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 13 May 2016 00:34:24 +0000
Received: by mail-ig0-f177.google.com with SMTP id s8so2461858ign.0 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 12 May 2016 17:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=TLXXTfyIFtxdLjeEAM9Wmw2WZBd4PtuFDG5ded7wOaw=; b=ynL8zvlxYYM5UfFXIkcRnQvJqa36YP5knFOmCeVsY4geZmFZ1pHdfl/e623mtQRwga wAxzvg6jVJKmqFQYa8zsr6eLuOPV0Y554diQt5+qFN6YRrzw7Z5V0tdeuSTTe5A8s9SG Gl8aHBD26jKFP24pbhBUyx5E23e+Z+K264DnRdnYggrULZz9a5v4e4noV1qbS+vwEErx 1DfIiQtywydHteFGTmQMDgHCCOMV03s9n1djxRl0evDob7qpzPqRmxXCqjQQ1M9jW2YY poGXQh0FECpA1dpiI/2gdHl8tS4OLd4w23JUqvR5gtnusNLq9msx7F7U9DIbedMZeDeD FurA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=TLXXTfyIFtxdLjeEAM9Wmw2WZBd4PtuFDG5ded7wOaw=; b=BptJZcsytkxzVTGF1rn/2Q67K9bWxfT23XHhqPTtxhz7p2RUJ3XBsz3hRp/YTr/tpV jFnpNgY2pVorDY70D4CzMiVZOtQERSz3JvMUpmI+9RF2VHRRzaxysUuJdq0pkE4IDK2j 4JCZekjHtxkTzPuo2mOQc8vDUpTRMwPcfDXj1JSqqawDhctExU3xMmB4qPV66SMtd8yg 5N7zPh5Fr3ysnLXVieA49doekcjUVv4IaD6OA0FdlL8n5xhjbTDQ0PBe1N6fyvCoP3oy svBb7pfX6DpGE57ZXonxjEkZGylC6cQYszdfD5O4sCKgDXa3cTX4Wwhlw2Pha7VEzGs8 8vhw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXmc8NCoB608YodaN6zAfQMNs2bASIqJ41fWgvIdTV2xuoRw51ElHVhPjLuYaw8ON9Rv5kEBr2eveBFwA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.30.73 with SMTP id q9mr432381igh.77.1463099636860; Thu, 12 May 2016 17:33:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.43.82 with HTTP; Thu, 12 May 2016 17:33:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <57351E03.1090103@measurement-factory.com>
References: <57351E03.1090103@measurement-factory.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 10:33:56 +1000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXMw+ZhAJM9sSX=CeV6HUG_7MoucpHLR2yFFj+ZV=dG5g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.213.177; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-ig0-f177.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.834, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1b113e-0007pw-QU 5d3c92a00c39da9faa636a48c710f25d
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: A fresh stale response
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnXMw+ZhAJM9sSX=CeV6HUG_7MoucpHLR2yFFj+ZV=dG5g@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/31644
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On 13 May 2016 at 10:21, Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com> wrote: > What if X > Y? So time just went backwards? I assume that this is the result of two requests that are fairly close to each other in time, to different nodes in a cluster, with some non-trivial clock skew between the two. That's possible, I suppose. It's all grey/gray to me. When such things happen, it's tempting to just throw up your hands and invoke the gods of undefined behaviour and do whatever is easiest for you.
- Re: A fresh stale response Martin Thomson
- A fresh stale response Alex Rousskov
- Re: A fresh stale response Mark Nottingham