Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 11 October 2016 09:33 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C814F12982F for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 02:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.917
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.917 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mjZFpM_4qQh4 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 02:33:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 205DA12982C for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 02:33:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1bttMU-0005jY-Tf for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:28:38 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:28:38 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1bttMU-0005jY-Tf@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1bttML-0005iV-Uw for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:28:29 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1bttMB-0002Vl-CV for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:28:26 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.197] ([5.10.171.186]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LrZOj-1arBJy1H2r-013P9V; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 11:27:51 +0200
To: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <147614675062.31404.12784998290683035391.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKXHy=cPSN7OD3JcZfUMf2tY_NzXf1tyHcZ8LfDt7+_p9hxXoQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <1cac24b6-6553-77af-2fbc-0c1932a3d9bd@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 11:27:50 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKXHy=cPSN7OD3JcZfUMf2tY_NzXf1tyHcZ8LfDt7+_p9hxXoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ySmpnAcMyUW57Axw9kp33J7+f0JQ8Hh5t3FLZnlTM3ZkAldYY3M jm9qeeeLKbdRGhHhPvl1g1UPB/RJvCswIYYWJeyNpRcM45GFH9cJpnCCpedAfgxnk52TTZt SgMlfEmQ/TvwRO79xX+6m7n2S7Gaei8NoT+L1TT3eSA93tmFEv8zDsE0Fo8mTNp4NdSDwl5 fQXP0WJ2JOlDSCW80ifjA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:uyPaVNck+3w=:bn5PWm6k2Zb5ifyF8hZlNU +2RyY+MHSdLXWB1gjPkTXgMEQUQuZaV70yXDK2t1iWlvfv4SARbbqxoOVMO4rjlLL/p3po64X pGmLzs6+IJcnE0iVkrHZ70my5oY+/g2z3lhY8g82k5ez/mDvpqEAwp1urDVAyEkrPX8Q5iGqQ r2zWkRmj254gLHLxxZFVDpoZYCTw5zpMCWUOnoQHt4m2ZnEG021fg3upsdbXmNbT/VsuGoPG0 zMBsR0o2GUpJUXnRwaSvikxD933FmE3K8J31cL/+eklJ5LMicKXKtebVsxqZPl2W6NAMeSFsR tdIAPjctYT8NQ3MFlr++R+oH4gXuRhGEjax4epztg9dlWckFCxBlMplmEi/OolMQbf+p/4a1o nufWA8c/mJekBKim4w5DNY8CilX6KKUD1hdfZbgap2ZPz34S0Kvgim8KId5czxlm5mFTM+o1P 7FnIf91VvtRkN9KsiYB4qX0AqkK108PPMKhGMZuHR/csnfxXeHjI6Hk3KbtwgJrodJDZC2BUs BA1nnE0tS4U1X7o111+vEtfryw/flRpMhjSoP3hlavpWnAN0I0/BJiINF4k3xqwozo0jsXpB9 abdnSlSxWy4qnpI3oXOzjy0+8ZlkZjtep47W35qX4CTLkoMf1qFcCTnMRnvocxavwCvW/ArFa 81wvVJnoxI6rvsZKhdA1xdgcs2vKQB0Diubn3hTxH0czUZ9zrH8/BnlS9CgHRIdZFnFhU2NMA bwlxu8ECO+oMk6jntlTsjeEmjC2fKc37SqabeZMThVinUkBanoLF+BTnrgpAm+11vysAq5Mij qHyGY2B
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.20; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.352, BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1bttMB-0002Vl-CV 5c8a8255f1a78e021d7f080eca340315
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/1cac24b6-6553-77af-2fbc-0c1932a3d9bd@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32555
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2016-10-11 07:34, Mike West wrote:
> This -00 draft kicks off the process of updating RFC6265. The text
> should be identical to the existing RFC, with the exception of the
> addition of explicit step numbers to various algorithms for clarity. I
> would appreciate it if interested folks would spot check this port, as
> it will serve as the basis for the various changes that the group has
> suggested it would be comfortable making.
>
> In the near future, I plan to start bringing in text from the various
> drafts we've adopted ("Leave Secure Cookies Alone
> <https://httpwg.github.io/http-extensions/draft-ietf-httpbis-cookie-alone.html>",
> "Cookie Prefixes
> <https://httpwg.github.io/http-extensions/draft-ietf-httpbis-cookie-prefixes.html>",
> "Same-Site Cookies
> <https://httpwg.github.io/http-extensions/draft-ietf-httpbis-cookie-same-site.html>",
> and "EAT Cookies
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-http-omnomnom>"), and
> addressing some of the open issues
> <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Aopp-sec>.
> I'll try to do so granularly, so folks can have a reasonable chance of
> evaluating each set of changes on its own.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -mike

FWIW, the changes from RFC 6265 are these: 
<https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt>

Best regards, Julian