Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-proxy-explanation-00.txt

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Mon, 29 February 2016 02:04 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F921B29B5 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 18:04:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JXStoR7nXBNw for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 18:04:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FEAF1B29B4 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 18:04:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1aaD7v-0004fw-Sr for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 01:59:59 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 01:59:59 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1aaD7v-0004fw-Sr@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1aaD7p-0004fB-Uw for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 01:59:53 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1aaD7o-00061b-2P for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 01:59:53 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.101] (unknown [120.149.194.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 21A8D22E200 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 20:59:25 -0500 (EST)
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 12:59:23 +1100
References: <20160217003812.7831.6278.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: HTTP WG <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <56F7C2DF-06AA-477C-8515-C152CC3A56A4@mnot.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.359, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1aaD7o-00061b-2P ebb3d6ebc7fde831fe7ebda818cc8903
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-proxy-explanation-00.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/56F7C2DF-06AA-477C-8515-C152CC3A56A4@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/31116
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

FYI - would be interested in what people thought, as I know some folks have this problem.

Pretty (and slightly updated) version at:
  https://mnot.github.io/I-D/proxy-explanation/


> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-proxy-explanation-00.txt
> Date: 17 February 2016 at 11:38:12 AM AEDT
> To: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-nottingham-proxy-explanation-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Mark Nottingham and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Name:		draft-nottingham-proxy-explanation
> Revision:	00
> Title:		The application/proxy-explanation+json media type
> Document date:	2016-02-17
> Group:		Individual Submission
> Pages:		7
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nottingham-proxy-explanation-00.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottingham-proxy-explanation/
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-proxy-explanation-00
> 
> 
> Abstract:
>   This specification defines the application/proxy-explanation+json
>   media type, to allow HTTP proxies to explain to clients why a request
>   is unsuccessful.
> 
> Note to Readers
> 
>   The issues list for this draft can be found at
>   https://github.com/mnot/I-D/labels/proxy-explanation .
> 
>   The most recent (often, unpublished) draft is at
>   https://mnot.github.io/I-D/proxy-explanation/ .
> 
>   Recent changes are listed at https://github.com/mnot/I-D/commits/gh-
>   pages/proxy-explanation .
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/