Re: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and HTTP Authentication

Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com> Mon, 30 April 2012 21:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AD7821E8091 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:24:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.577
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.577 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.021, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UIM6gEehzKFn for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:24:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF30D21E808B for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:24:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1SOy3i-00013L-4y for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 21:23:02 +0000
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bizzbyster@gmail.com>) id 1SOy3Y-000125-8N for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 21:22:52 +0000
Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com ([209.85.212.179]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bizzbyster@gmail.com>) id 1SOy3U-0002KE-QZ for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 21:22:50 +0000
Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so2716314wib.8 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:22:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=GdvTXAh+vVuhLkA0Yz0ZZM9cU3xLzSst1zyyx27Uh/8=; b=trfkzxdAO9SpEgv6dmsZYLyZiQLywEunuyhfLYaVn+dJIHUnJ8ycQVML470uE/8w8M me/BVSahqQD50RYO8VKCrHJ9rAOLUd4JLc1zBaYkzoaIplp/j928AQ3H70IrxeU9eqBE /2GJykN/KycG/nRNAye7pSLMaOG/58XWpFHCsb20zfb7XE+JFoHOhv+KVT3tK4+dNWr3 hCYjpDi2OSRBq9cxX/GSXF4GZM/5WCyWl4umqd0Z4t8S1fmntkwYRuTD8H/j3CgM6YLh 9kqRa8A9+US8kfGC+sFPYi4PKh+vs/b5lFuPwwvQTTrKYgfpfDSM68oNcV+wYYoxDP6k hEQA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.131.24 with SMTP id l24mr13512262wei.76.1335820942173; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.139.131 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <14A09626-8397-4656-A042-FEFDDD017C9F@mnot.net>
References: <14A09626-8397-4656-A042-FEFDDD017C9F@mnot.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:22:22 -0400
Message-ID: <CANmPAYH60+wmeYQAikUd4ps3HdPQSm80TeZbMW37LioBYVj-7A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d7ef50bde4fe04beec0c34
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.212.179; envelope-from=bizzbyster@gmail.com; helo=mail-wi0-f179.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1SOy3U-0002KE-QZ 8cb4701d8488cdd5baf96327106953d8
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and HTTP Authentication
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CANmPAYH60+wmeYQAikUd4ps3HdPQSm80TeZbMW37LioBYVj-7A@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/13496
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Resent-Message-Id: <E1SOy3i-00013L-4y@frink.w3.org>
Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 21:23:02 +0000

Hi Mark,

Earlier this group discussed the idea of a "trusted proxy". Does that fall
under the HTTP/2.0 category?

I may have some cycles for this.

Thanks,

Peter

On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>; wrote:

> Just a reminder that we're still accepting proposals for:
>
> 1. HTTP/2.0
> 2. New HTTP authentication schemes
>
> As per our charter <http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/charter/>;.
>
> So far, we've received the following proposals applicable to HTTP/2.0:
>  <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/wiki/Http2Proposals>
>
> But none yet for authentication schemes:
>  <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/wiki/HttpAuthProposals>
>
> As communicated in Paris, the deadline for proposals is 15 June, 2012.
> It's fine if your proposal isn't complete, but we do need to have a  good
> sense of it by then, for discussion.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
>
>