IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Call for Adoption: Cache HTTP Response Header

Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> Sun, 13 January 2019 20:32 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D47A128766 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 12:32:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.141
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.141 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.142, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jIIlVnrBVPgl for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 12:32:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [IPv6:2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44AA9127598 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 12:32:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1gimOW-0003Y1-C8 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 20:30:08 +0000
Resent-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2019 20:30:08 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1gimOW-0003Y1-C8@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:4c]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>) id 1gimOV-0003RC-1o for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 20:30:07 +0000
Received: from mail-ua1-x92e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::92e]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>) id 1gimOT-0003yZ-US for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 20:30:06 +0000
Received: by mail-ua1-x92e.google.com with SMTP id d21so6406807uap.9 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 12:29:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=dP+X9wzEvphf5RPkRCJEYbl+1BFHxga5J+FQJSuijx0=; b=aSD5BiEYc6dxDIf/fumDdQIHzua7uf212rZMrmFQ5HYzr6+NP2LDbx+lzNMVLQsPwJ v2ElxzQiUyMWI+bWK7j49VzvrmYBgDh465lA1M/UX2MyeXOC7RxemihWNc36sLuP/Bp9 yVngov1u68j9XL3Fe+2Fp2v6zCPMWIeQFwPOwdudW/Cpv9wsbu4WSQLLM9wMmPpcJIVh tM8DYVvq7J2PS/Uo6l3wflG0Wygn+bTZuIziNP3ba4pYr2jPNA1SuUuYJtDomMgaPK+j Ho5ZqouVqQp9pEkZPHz0tm+EXN1eDKK+W+toHkne73MDuOg8gRox4HRMHAdZuNnK4ht5 UDqg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dP+X9wzEvphf5RPkRCJEYbl+1BFHxga5J+FQJSuijx0=; b=B6Je873An0wvT9HVs5MUjQifNEnD/Ae//KFzk96RLFy6jZylqQ1UunFnkeXRMpbTe0 VtEXiAZfcr8JGwG8FaY+1Fvfs6PbT8I1NOMkRhXtcaCXSWeBO6S+FCGxfL2BYCvGZtVU 6MTU/u9EL8KGjx9o/0SIL7sQifM28YyS9bUg/9Pc0clNJxMcA59CNoJt0ll/6bCfCTUT ZnY20Pypcb0DljVfzmW0SBPSOMHNrmHp1h3qhx6niE/3tGxkgYqXJrAUcr/lABT3CmB6 Uunu9tV01A//9FHLhKLnImYfsL0t6hjtealvH0kDBJ6Bto+mJips/sa5RczzgxmIv2Vw IV+w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukfEqW3+6N52Oicia3nn6CNAcifKkFb0RllWtFn524ZAbicCtNZN EtENZ7D1hkZ7V77R86IfyPuuw0/qLHKqagEh9RI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN78QsHQzxFjqNJU7uDfLr+O0v7RDUqGa+4Z3vA6YkDjSIV9dbrQLna569LGt0jh2WQlyzv12KnNky3lJjLTBaQ=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:13d3:: with SMTP id n19mr8084189uae.37.1547411385160; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 12:29:45 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <EF86EE31-622A-4520-B99D-4F2ADA2DB689@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <EF86EE31-622A-4520-B99D-4F2ADA2DB689@apple.com>
From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2019 20:29:32 +0000
Message-ID: <CALGR9oZ509yiNj_DwDiHUDb_XUeeijws=3DTp-4qGgBxDShnaw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, httpbis-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ef1a43057f5cc982"
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.346, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1gimOT-0003yZ-US 291e611f090a16bc6e40e53455ae569f
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption: Cache HTTP Response Header
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CALGR9oZ509yiNj_DwDiHUDb_XUeeijws=3DTp-4qGgBxDShnaw@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/36267
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I am in support of adopting this. The initial proposal generated some
discussion and I think it would be too to adopt the document to further
that and incorporate WG ideas.

Lucas

On Sun, 13 Jan 2019, 20:23 Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com wrote:

> Hello HTTPBis,
>
> In Bangkok, we had a presentation from Mark on a draft to define a
> standard Cache HTTP Response Header, that can be used to replace
> non-standard uses of the "X-Cache" header. The document can be found here:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-cache-header-00.
>
> The response in the room was favorable to having the group work on this
> header, but we didn't have time (and hadn't had sufficient discussion) to
> do a formal call for adoption.
>
> This email starts a request for feedback, and a call for adoption. Please
> reply to this email with your thoughts, and state whether or not you
> believe the group should adopt this document. Feedback is requested by *Friday,
> January 25th*.
>
> Best,
> Tommy
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email