IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Call for Adoption: Cache HTTP Response Header

Thomas Peterson <hidinginthebbc@gmail.com> Mon, 14 January 2019 09:51 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F77130FC1 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 01:51:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.14
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.14 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.142, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yo3bMdgpGBzB for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 01:51:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [IPv6:2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2C5312896A for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 01:51:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1giyrY-0002kT-KK for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 09:48:56 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 09:48:56 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1giyrY-0002kT-KK@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:4c]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <hidinginthebbc@gmail.com>) id 1giyrX-0002jq-47 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 09:48:55 +0000
Received: from mail-wr1-x429.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::429]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <hidinginthebbc@gmail.com>) id 1giyrW-00037X-0P for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 09:48:54 +0000
Received: by mail-wr1-x429.google.com with SMTP id u4so22050968wrp.3 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 01:48:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=SXrhtW/KZ4XhtVAcO/JFyjk4VB2i3+/FXW4GAGp/Rj0=; b=HpqUjyoX8APFxPbm6TCUvHEVWAUBvwCgtvJukcY5OZN6xaa51F4DtuY57O7J68cB17 HpF2T1h5d22qItoG7i9PoqezeEb9kjDUen2dG77MLfa0+2xxQ+AoDQAVZMlkxh5W+BGn yDmVUTgwIU3oCvvLnWFuzmrBxjyRH9SUQw+xCbzgU7Gc3HdP8IcUzgv5MZtQQwe8UqDO xxs0U0CsDhx23VsbBxGqszTfh+oMR1t3xx3umIcl5zyRqWixIRwbag/IdVNbDKO8kNLJ pMFxp3rxIFzmEr5eP0nDvu7mRR/24xBxZ4GEsuBqb5SrE2etAgJvVHu2ZK9EDAlNirvg 3ttA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=SXrhtW/KZ4XhtVAcO/JFyjk4VB2i3+/FXW4GAGp/Rj0=; b=HqP7h6FJTK19Vrl14SV//Oq9mpy4SakvgrpJDWNy4SD4dzMQ0n0E0vifrgDBl9nnaQ OYm6zJ0FTJUQpgXBScVsJISAtAxN4lzy09yUXyWnU4r6EGzHkgFhtg7cMBPzz2CmB4Wt gXp1nsPxTPg6odv0ZXwr10lsIOlBNWjun4kqMPYx9ftWOb1Mn5wKeLxzk2Xb0W/QOuhC 4G2eIeoFxwSH8/LMQd8h2Eos/Uw9RsRZ31h5u4uwJpJ8GK7thOz9XTqAC+hr4Svdg0Fc nFkzpY/Iv4oyHvuqRhdq04MwZ3L+Qw/uVMHbDMoJZ8fiLZsZGKTBxnoGvk6wf3C62xOk 9DiQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukderFKIb8SYuUnKeE4H3J6oh7JhoRHyfUfEdXnE0PQt3Lf3scnK ZA+pKr/tnOcBwinGQ8iNZ7I=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6wGrChEfO/YcNAIghtoDiFx+/8zjMzqzEAi88M23NAKwMoIFFirU+A10dUr5awNENGuF9hNA==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:9168:: with SMTP id j95mr23038795wrj.217.1547459312791; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 01:48:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ROADKILL.local ([132.185.158.35]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k15sm105391220wru.8.2019.01.14.01.48.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 14 Jan 2019 01:48:32 -0800 (PST)
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Cc: httpbis-chairs@ietf.org
References: <EF86EE31-622A-4520-B99D-4F2ADA2DB689@apple.com>
From: Thomas Peterson <hidinginthebbc@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1bff471c-f7c3-015b-dac7-af7e702628f5@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 09:48:31 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <EF86EE31-622A-4520-B99D-4F2ADA2DB689@apple.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------63DB0FCA7A969D697A8838DC"
Content-Language: en-GB
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.418, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1giyrW-00037X-0P 874bca5448174ab291e38339ebea6e58
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption: Cache HTTP Response Header
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/1bff471c-f7c3-015b-dac7-af7e702628f5@gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/36269
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I too am also in favour of adopting, and despite my initial concerns not 
being completely addressed with any update to the document (see 
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2018JulSep/0314.html), 
I don't believe these should block it moving forward.


Regards


On 13/01/2019 20:19, Tommy Pauly wrote:
> Hello HTTPBis,
>
> In Bangkok, we had a presentation from Mark on a draft to define a 
> standard Cache HTTP Response Header, that can be used to replace 
> non-standard uses of the "X-Cache" header. The document can be found 
> here: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-cache-header-00.
>
> The response in the room was favorable to having the group work on 
> this header, but we didn't have time (and hadn't had sufficient 
> discussion) to do a formal call for adoption.
>
> This email starts a request for feedback, and a call for adoption. 
> Please reply to this email with your thoughts, and state whether or 
> not you believe the group should adopt this document. Feedback is 
> requested by *Friday, January 25th*.
>
> Best,
> Tommy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email