[Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7231 (4452)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sat, 22 August 2015 23:33 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B0AE1A0103 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 16:33:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LLJuAcu1Cd_6 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 16:33:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D96821A0102 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 16:33:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1ZTIE2-0003zd-8H for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 23:29:26 +0000
Resent-Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 23:29:26 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1ZTIE2-0003zd-8H@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>) id 1ZTIDx-0003ys-Ux for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 23:29:21 +0000
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([4.31.198.49]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>) id 1ZTIDw-0002pC-G0 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 23:29:21 +0000
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id B12BE180092; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 16:28:51 -0700 (PDT)
To: fielding@gbiv.com, julian.reschke@greenbytes.de, barryleiba@computer.org, mnot@mnot.net
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: toraritte@gmail.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20150822232851.B12BE180092@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 16:28:51 -0700
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=4.31.198.49; envelope-from=wwwrun@rfc-editor.org; helo=rfc-editor.org
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.668, BAYES_20=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.883, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1ZTIDw-0002pC-G0 ba5b622448b84399f5722a75c16e4760
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7231 (4452)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/20150822232851.B12BE180092@rfc-editor.org>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/30089
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7231, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7231&eid=4452 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Attila Gulyas <toraritte@gmail.com> Section: 6.4 Original Text ------------- Automatic redirection needs to done with care for methods not known to be safe, as defined in Section 4.2.1, since the user might not wish to redirect an unsafe request. Corrected Text -------------- Automatic redirection needs to be done with care for methods not known to be safe, as defined in Section 4.2.1, since the user might not wish to redirect an unsafe request. Notes ----- A simple typo ("needs to _be_ done") Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7231 (draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-26) -------------------------------------- Title : Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content Publication Date : June 2014 Author(s) : R. Fielding, Ed., J. Reschke, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis APP Area : Applications Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7231 (4452) RFC Errata System
- [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7231 (4452) RFC Errata System