[Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7231 (4452)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sun, 23 August 2015 00:02 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC211A6F32 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 17:02:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1FtArTZFrIgA for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 17:02:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F22851A6F2F for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1ZTIha-000838-I2 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 23:59:58 +0000
Resent-Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 23:59:58 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1ZTIha-000838-I2@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>) id 1ZTIhW-00082R-Gh for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 23:59:54 +0000
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([4.31.198.49]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>) id 1ZTIhT-0003fk-L6 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 23:59:53 +0000
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 3D389180092; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 16:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
To: toraritte@gmail.com, fielding@gbiv.com, julian.reschke@greenbytes.de
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: barryleiba@computer.org, iesg@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20150822235924.3D389180092@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 16:59:24 -0700
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=4.31.198.49; envelope-from=wwwrun@rfc-editor.org; helo=rfc-editor.org
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.595, BAYES_20=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.883, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1ZTIhT-0003fk-L6 86a0a08640b47821ae68bb844f035979
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7231 (4452)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/20150822235924.3D389180092@rfc-editor.org>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/30090
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

The following errata report has been held for document update 
for RFC7231, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7231&eid=4452

--------------------------------------
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Attila Gulyas <toraritte@gmail.com>
Date Reported: 2015-08-22
Held by: Barry Leiba (IESG)

Section: 6.4

Original Text
-------------
Automatic redirection needs to done with
   care for methods not known to be safe, as defined in Section 4.2.1,
   since the user might not wish to redirect an unsafe request.

Corrected Text
--------------
Automatic redirection needs to be done with
   care for methods not known to be safe, as defined in Section 4.2.1,
   since the user might not wish to redirect an unsafe request.

Notes
-----
A simple typo ("needs to _be_ done")

--------------------------------------
RFC7231 (draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-26)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content
Publication Date    : June 2014
Author(s)           : R. Fielding, Ed., J. Reschke, Ed.
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis APP
Area                : Applications
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG