IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-00.txt

Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> Thu, 05 March 2020 21:39 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C3D3A0C87 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 13:39:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.25
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.25 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K0_s9cR7xaM2 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 13:39:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9514F3A0C80 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 13:39:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1j9yAX-0001bj-GD for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 21:36:37 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 21:36:37 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1j9yAX-0001bj-GD@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ianswett@google.com>) id 1j9yAS-0001b1-Aq for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 21:36:32 +0000
Received: from mail-wr1-x432.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::432]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ianswett@google.com>) id 1j9yAQ-0006wd-UG for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 21:36:32 +0000
Received: by mail-wr1-x432.google.com with SMTP id n15so3484267wrw.13 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 13:36:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=sPO699xLonE1LowrEp7B4ENFxdJkP9xN7J4Tv/O948Y=; b=EoVuMpQI9/IV7oJ/nmnAKCaHGddDQxyECNoengnEf8A8vluXKOTKHxTCqTCyl5gAqm 49ly0foWZOqvWEH+cx/4SkrM8xI80DcdmYjiZapUjkpzLung5OhfYmA+N69pJ5LRbD/H pmS05UNzoqXJY73hQ3tfSGTif8O04+bSZSuh+ty20Go7WKiWTJJKV5WytlMBurlEtZrv dTDHUI9XcQcIWpv+PNVDJjOVOzjOR8V4+eSROCpZ+0w6/BJRDdoR3Old18CVW2ZVlWwl daFepQ/Sf+1bI2LvHRIXIj98Qh50TGc1B3z2fjuWkSrc+s1EBGzI+uTeOeGIjgkrkguy pZlQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sPO699xLonE1LowrEp7B4ENFxdJkP9xN7J4Tv/O948Y=; b=J+U+B3x8gqZM+AfszdrjF7wYcOGD7wEL4CGHgvil72XIe2GzkEtTNi3K8ayRIn15tm /9+tc2LM1iYsRTHhYP5ElW1zpNaqOmFWEB8UTZ2dF1OUs4Ahr83R3M6mKbGp+1TYbOQn tTFYMY+sB05Ji5/BDlkX0QSiFkWi+s0GkodYq2c9lsiESbprEJygBYVfDHKo81mTMqJL YfkyKFIwB5wM6VJcMr/MMi56aucYhlBpv4MTvotxjbhJdMvgYEqTlV5icfxegwiTx1kA K+gmzvl3z5ztv980RnNTDU0wnIBE8Vz9rEmcjogEoGIBwK+TB8n2pSo/pW9rlHw/FoPH hUyQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2TMqlgGtvsYXHqR2VXpk+NbP3me6/TH+wv9ZTAlgIVPn+8+lcH DvsgUHTpk6zLdTgE95aMYLJWlyhU3wkMbqcqzls1gojg
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsfv/DUgBm5rLqOrpXiYruxCeiCIPC4Yo4Gpxia4GVkhMKviwFkaDD/ABsICrX5q5f2ouILIm7Ucr2ZI+SutPo=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6a03:: with SMTP id m3mr849503wru.275.1583444178997; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 13:36:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <158342819915.14611.53810193547146190@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALGR9obw90VweYQybVHSs=5MYJe8PUMt+adEAppLZ=QVPcKUew@mail.gmail.com> <CAKcm_gO+B92LKDKdcfJwq4SbXjzh7q8qKER=3U7K=MO1VhH4Aw@mail.gmail.com> <CALGR9oZ9sHGtr5yNHCKM9Hgp7nHAz4WTaTF=AerD666dCmF14g@mail.gmail.com> <3AFE2DC4-C4D6-478A-BFCC-448FD3B2915E@fb.com> <012fa5f9-c234-4b25-ac5a-c12d5387715f@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <012fa5f9-c234-4b25-ac5a-c12d5387715f@www.fastmail.com>
From: Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 16:36:05 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKcm_gOummxX8RibT6nqnX68ifZiZveAMELWNg4Q+43R5nfiyg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d00d8805a0225389"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::432; envelope-from=ianswett@google.com; helo=mail-wr1-x432.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-19.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1j9yAQ-0006wd-UG 5886e4066dbe31ef6ef04993813380dc
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-00.txt
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CAKcm_gOummxX8RibT6nqnX68ifZiZveAMELWNg4Q+43R5nfiyg@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37414
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Martin's concern is exactly right.

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 4:24 PM Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 6, 2020, at 07:43, Roberto Peon wrote:
> > Until HTTP offers chunk-extensions again, I don’t see how it can be
> otherwise?
>
> I don't think that's the concern, it's that there is no way for a client
> to send an update if the request stream is closed.  At least in QUIC.
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email