IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: HTTP2 server-side stream creation

Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk> Wed, 08 July 2015 11:01 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF371A888F for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 04:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.29
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c8557TRObVs6 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 04:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F0041A88D7 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 04:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1ZCn3z-00073l-IO for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 10:58:51 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 10:58:51 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1ZCn3z-00073l-IO@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <cory@lukasa.co.uk>) id 1ZCn3w-00072o-F7 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 10:58:48 +0000
Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.220.43]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <cory@lukasa.co.uk>) id 1ZCn3s-0001zn-Cp for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 10:58:48 +0000
Received: by pacws9 with SMTP id ws9so131415510pac.0 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 03:58:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=JRJxw8RFyv9bqk2BULiUpU3Gtr7Xn6Rz3h2v4DpoiVA=; b=bDhG64rS8dx5prxK2f/CFBwu87A9F5OkF8S5TbS2uLJq6A4chcu2miLj5tmdvW0k/h qXDwAYNQ18Gc4FKN1RTZ18l0gqgrhH4mXyYYslURGOEuZCATpOmrsFrP0Cxw67kJ44VU taOCqxsG2CwGhVFCso8zWRnV9NG4TUNv1XqXyLHdGdy2WR+vc64fwe/00VTmYPZYvF8o XOAkZ2gzfWN+MH7dTqbRxwzEYoSr6oT4oMbu69LJEtKX9wTdNztwoAiPbQhJg3REqJq0 h2NvxWiWUcwEH7q+D63SDxhz+N79tjqoeDzQRTokECu80FUf9nfUQxbF8L/LdjzZ/9zN 1AAA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQks+nkxu0M0XeuEb3ICUzOHTk4wGAmCI0F1bVhL6hgzztIFR2k7udJwdtTJbXlVb05RtxvA
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.67.30.136 with SMTP id ke8mr19084672pad.79.1436353097274; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 03:58:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.152.164 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 03:58:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [2620:104:4001:72:d511:4447:a82d:bd3d]
In-Reply-To: <559CFBB3.1040908@treenet.co.nz>
References: <CAEv2VfJKzwAA98hqVAnEDAfP4ixF3YSJ3TLMmA=b1zf2O8GpwQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAH_hAJE+9Y5rZeHPHNpDYW6p4jQEC1yN5C3Jd96M-YiZrY0mFw@mail.gmail.com> <559CFBB3.1040908@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 11:58:17 +0100
Message-ID: <CAH_hAJHyJZ59C5OEVxoMT_2w+bLVdV-et086CBR=oKKFr3mNFQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>
To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.220.43; envelope-from=cory@lukasa.co.uk; helo=mail-pa0-f43.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.675, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1ZCn3s-0001zn-Cp 15ef8f21e248e467d376add9d2ced12e
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: HTTP2 server-side stream creation
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAH_hAJHyJZ59C5OEVxoMT_2w+bLVdV-et086CBR=oKKFr3mNFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/29878
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 8 July 2015 at 11:30, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote:
> If you have a strong use case for it I suggest writing up a SETTINGS
> extension which can be negotiated between two endpoints. That way 2->1.1
> gateway devices can negotiate its absence for the 1.1 hops and things
> still work.

I can certainly see a case for it. I'll see if I can whip up an ID
sometime today to use as a starting point for discussion on this.

Cory

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email