Re: Fw: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames-01.txt
James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Thu, 22 May 2014 17:44 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 947A51A0275 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 May 2014 10:44:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.653
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.653 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dZC-VRw-BCct for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 May 2014 10:44:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8D631A028F for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 22 May 2014 10:44:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1WnX0t-0007DH-NH for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 17:42:43 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 17:42:43 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1WnX0t-0007DH-NH@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jasnell@gmail.com>) id 1WnX0i-00077w-Cq for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 17:42:32 +0000
Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jasnell@gmail.com>) id 1WnX0h-0005V4-6f for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 17:42:32 +0000
Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id a1so3730943wgh.27 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 22 May 2014 10:42:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QI++z085yW31NjmtRzOQLSW3x8ABmqvy/sk91eDsvzs=; b=g2l4R9DC+6RLXRcWcuZOxPvYnU9g4eJVYvxvwl5fY2BvvyyX6q+aSXGdRuEhJo8ksN CowD+kMgEnCSkV9w2KGNjA1laO5/hOP0oV3y2BWPEjH8N5XFvH5FUmIcDMyol54zFDYa 8p77XvaHxIWZQw2wJfj1NASZydgbpfgRoUcUmNziTgC9OODIGIHpVqWXaQro0tZtL13a h29u44eZgLGLea7PSRGfkV/P7gxo+z5V7L+YCcAlSuXfgCInBg+abBcNeQ+oCLsaDla7 MpYXlOWnj+EicSR+9r+dW/pLq5EA8aWGPPNuvEUCHbtWpZ8FycJeYCKinXk2pHsLlVph nIng==
X-Received: by 10.194.63.46 with SMTP id d14mr51500566wjs.24.1400780524787; Thu, 22 May 2014 10:42:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.223.68 with HTTP; Thu, 22 May 2014 10:41:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <239431af5fe34e57a704ea52f84e1991@BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20140522172435.21175.94088.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <239431af5fe34e57a704ea52f84e1991@BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 10:41:44 -0700
Message-ID: <CABP7RbeNnEvtgoVwJv1MeOPcZKhjyUYSkUzwAmBNLnND_O+2Dw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=74.125.82.44; envelope-from=jasnell@gmail.com; helo=mail-wg0-f44.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.707, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1WnX0h-0005V4-6f ee082073e4497e3793225309c8cb60e2
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Fw: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames-01.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABP7RbeNnEvtgoVwJv1MeOPcZKhjyUYSkUzwAmBNLnND_O+2Dw@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/23765
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+1... many times over. On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> wrote: > When we decided in Zurich to foreclose the option to extend HTTP/2, we > thought that we were close to done with the basic protocol. And it’s true > -- the fundamentals of HTTP/2 haven’t changed all that much since then. But > various cases keep coming up where certain parties need to add one more > feature. While these aren’t core to the HTTP/2 protocol, they’re also not > worth versioning the protocol for later, and so we’ve added them to the spec > for experimentation as optional components. > > This draft proposes that many of these would be perfectly valid use-cases > for extensions, and that we might make progress more quickly if we add a > simple extension model. I believe that the time we take in getting the > extension model right will be more than offset by the ability to unblock the > protocol and still handle new situations as they arise, even though we’re > late in the process. > > I want to emphasize that the goal of the extension model is simplicity in > the core protocol, and I’d welcome feedback on how to simplify it further. > > Sent from Windows Mail > > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org > Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 10:24 AM > To: Mike Bishop, Mike Bishop > > > A new version of I-D, draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames-01.txt > has been successfully submitted by Mike Bishop and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name: draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames > Revision: 01 > Title: Extension Frames in HTTP/2 > Document date: 2014-05-22 > Group: Individual Submission > Pages: 18 > URL: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames-01.txt > Status: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames/ > Htmlized: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames-01 > Diff: > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames-01 > > Abstract: > This document describes a proposed modification to the HTTP/2 > specification to better support the creation of extensions without > the need to version the core protocol or invoke additional protocol > identifiers. > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > The IETF Secretariat >
- Fw: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-htt… Mike Bishop
- Re: Fw: New Version Notification for draft-bishop… James M Snell
- Re: Fw: New Version Notification for draft-bishop… Roberto Peon
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-htt… Michael Sweet
- Re: Fw: New Version Notification for draft-bishop… Matthew Kerwin
- Re: Fw: New Version Notification for draft-bishop… Roberto Peon
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-htt… Mark Nottingham
- Re: Fw: New Version Notification for draft-bishop… Matthew Kerwin
- Re: Fw: New Version Notification for draft-bishop… James M Snell
- Re: Fw: New Version Notification for draft-bishop… James M Snell
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-htt… Mike Bishop
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-htt… Matthew Kerwin
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-htt… James M Snell
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-htt… K.Morgan
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-htt… Mark Nottingham