Re: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames-01.txt

Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com> Thu, 22 May 2014 18:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD3D61A027D for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 May 2014 11:00:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.461
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.461 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.981, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MLrzuM7b0ggf for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 May 2014 11:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BDCF1A026C for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 22 May 2014 11:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1WnXGX-0006bD-9a for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 17:58:53 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 17:58:53 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1WnXGX-0006bD-9a@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <msweet@apple.com>) id 1WnXGA-0006Zk-Ll for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 17:58:30 +0000
Received: from mail-out7.apple.com ([17.151.62.29] helo=mail-in7.apple.com) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <msweet@apple.com>) id 1WnXG8-0000X9-3X for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 17:58:30 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=apple.com; s=mailout2048s; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@apple.com; t=1400781480; x=2264695080; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-id:To:Cc:MIME-version:Content-type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-reply-to:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=JV5WgjLA4EFFyr9y51AHYOy68t9wkMvw78OgHeUHzxA=; b=3ANVKwvNK1H9on7qwpvJv5HpNYwCi3CXGFxLP1LSVqzbravqS1L9xxOhgYNiy+dq y3z8ynFW5pHY3zXGoaGXyfsKjMx4VwKJvO7L5ZShYRqK/jd8fXjhRdxoYyZNHyKp RyLHIgF67qjo2HeTUzGWm8BJIsHs2pk5EJ/4ODK1kyitbX+98tRJgL3pHkxWWJ2x /0DLyZw5ZDSD25oNHJxQWvCSvM4Kd5ExFF89h1h6I52hqme9+PZAK8fXbK6s9Riz 5cI6t42To/CaZlKvAMkSJxpb942R6rE3KRDqUlPGe5wFuWp0NrFmXEJ9JdwZ79bI H2Zl1l5VBPsqY6i6RiHPNg==;
Received: from mail-out.apple.com (mail-out.apple.com [17.151.62.50]) (using TLS with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail-in7.apple.com (Apple Secure Mail Relay) with SMTP id 13.8F.16715.8AA3E735; Thu, 22 May 2014 10:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Received: from relay2.apple.com ([17.128.113.67]) by local.mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.30.0 64bit (built Oct 22 2013)) with ESMTP id <0N5Z006PGLU1DGJ1@local.mail-out.apple.com> for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 10:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 11973e16-f79c36d00000414b-df-537e3aa8cc4e
Received: from spicerack.apple.com (spicerack.apple.com [17.128.115.40]) (using TLS with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay2.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id CC.6E.05587.9AA3E735; Thu, 22 May 2014 10:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [17.153.53.51] (unknown [17.153.53.51]) by spicerack.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.30.0 64bit (built Oct 22 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0N5Z00IUGLWM2E30@spicerack.apple.com> for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 10:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
Content-type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_22CC6521-7C38-4070-A612-3791DC334799"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
From: Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <239431af5fe34e57a704ea52f84e1991@BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 13:57:58 -0400
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-id: <964A694D-37B5-4FBC-A2E9-85230BF61D31@apple.com>
References: <20140522172435.21175.94088.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <239431af5fe34e57a704ea52f84e1991@BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
To: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFuphkeLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42IRnG5npLvCqi7Y4MFkM4vDLbOYHBg9js7b zxrAGMVlk5Kak1mWWqRvl8CVsXxLA3vBu37Gin+9h1kaGI82MXYxcnJICJhIfD6whQnCFpO4 cG89WxcjF4eQwCwmiRMTVrOCJHgFBCV+TL7HApc4NqEDrrvl7U5WiMRkJolfU/rARgkJzGSS OHlAAcQWFgiTuPd+B9hYZoEpjBLbf79jAUmwCahJ/J7UB7aCUyBCYlb7NbA4i4CqxPWJZ8Fs ZgEdiUd/N7BBnGEjMWPfQnaIbb2MEtuOXgA7Q0RAT2LGi83MECfJS8xoPwFWJCFwjE2ie3IT +wRG4VlI/piF7JJZYFuSJJatfM0OYWtLLFv4mhnC1pTY372cBVNcQ6Lz20RWCNtU4snb7WwQ trXEzzmPGCFsRYkp3Q/ZFzByrWIUyk3MzNHNzDPXSywoyEnVS87P3cQIiT6xHYwPV1kdYhTg YFTi4X3AVBcsxJpYVlyZe4hRmoNFSZw3Y2d1sJBAemJJanZqakFqUXxRaU5q8SFGJg5OqQZG PfYJ2mVuoadXz14vvWVxVtDhjQdPT5qtXVmRsEGhbE6VlBz7qgs187n4r2yTPJLF/LLU8Wfe /1cCpxUk/zrZPrdV8X9y7ZGX2HFhhttPvjxkvRweuYP7ftN9c9ZHMTtWhm+1dXt5U/L/saen ftTWcPULPN9eZi6yVED7HWPpowcalfnM2679VmIpzkg01GIuKk4EACqTXMmfAgAA
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrHLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUi2FCsobvSqi7Y4OQXGYvDLbOYHBg9js7b zxrAGMVlk5Kak1mWWqRvl8CVsXxLA3vBu37Gin+9h1kaGI82MXYxcnJICJhItLzdyQphi0lc uLeerYuRi0NIYDKTRP+2H8wgCSGBmUwSJw8ogNjCAmES997vYAOxeQUMJN4cPM4E0sAsMIVR YvvvdywgCTYBNYnfk/rApnIKREjMar8GFmcRUJW4PvEsmM0soCPx6O8GqEE2EjP2LWSH2NzL KLHt6AWw80QE9CRmvNjMDHGevMSM9hPsExj5ZyFZPgvZ8llgg5Mklq18zQ5ha0ssW/iaGcLW lNjfvZwFU1xDovPbRFYI21TiydvtbBC2tcTPOY8YIWxFiSndD9kXMHKtYhQoSs1JrDTSSywo yEnVS87P3cQIjolC5x2Mx5ZZHWIU4GBU4uF9wFQXLMSaWFZcmXuIUQVoxKMNqy8wSrHk5eel KonwXjMFSvOmJFZWpRblxxeV5qQWH2KU5mBREufttq0JFhJITyxJzU5NLUgtgskycXBKNTDm 7gvnPWZouUja42hGV0/cd9Nlyq+zzywOzsj6/Oq32O2GlbJmkYe146b/1N9X17W12vr5owdd ivsdLjEfyleYWRtW9HvzwT03FL8tVm2btbiz7lGtY/7taP9J3u5yJZvrdr7m2McZxLPgm9BK jgM9r/cyS6ffd3xeGmaSsqvS3HfGp8p7LxiUWIozEg21mIuKEwHWMOQlkQIAAA==
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=17.151.62.29; envelope-from=msweet@apple.com; helo=mail-in7.apple.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.967, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.289, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1WnXG8-0000X9-3X f354b30d9e318473ece3b0cee665a6b2
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames-01.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/964A694D-37B5-4FBC-A2E9-85230BF61D31@apple.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/23767
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

+1

On May 22, 2014, at 1:34 PM, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> wrote:

> When we decided in Zurich to foreclose the option to extend HTTP/2, we thought that we were close to done with the basic protocol.  And it’s true -- the fundamentals of HTTP/2 haven’t changed all that much since then.  But various cases keep coming up where certain parties need to add one more feature.  While these aren’t core to the HTTP/2 protocol, they’re also not worth versioning the protocol for later, and so we’ve added them to the spec for experimentation as optional components.
> 
> This draft proposes that many of these would be perfectly valid use-cases for extensions, and that we might make progress more quickly if we add a simple extension model.  I believe that the time we take in getting the extension model right will be more than offset by the ability to unblock the protocol and still handle new situations as they arise, even though we’re late in the process.
> 
> I want to emphasize that the goal of the extension model is simplicity in the core protocol, and I’d welcome feedback on how to simplify it further.
> Sent from Windows Mail
> 
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Sent: ‎Thursday‎, ‎May‎ ‎22‎, ‎2014 ‎10‎:‎24‎ ‎AM
> To: Mike Bishop, Mike Bishop
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames-01.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Mike Bishop and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Name:  draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames
> Revision: 01
> Title:  Extension Frames in HTTP/2
> Document date: 2014-05-22
> Group:  Individual Submission
> Pages:  18
> URL:            http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames-01.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames/
> Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames-01
> Diff:           http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames-01
> 
> Abstract:
>    This document describes a proposed modification to the HTTP/2
>    specification to better support the creation of extensions without
>    the need to version the core protocol or invoke additional protocol
>    identifiers.
> 
>                                                                                   
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> 

_________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair