HTTPBis Agenda for Chicago IETF 98

Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com> Tue, 14 March 2017 20:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3081314A2 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:21:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sendgrid.me
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5A-ZGIDsb4Pq for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:21:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A40BD1314A1 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:21:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1cnstI-0006zv-LI for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 20:17:56 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 20:17:56 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1cnstI-0006zv-LI@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <bounces+1568871-208f-ietf-http-wg=w3.org@sendgrid.net>) id 1cnst7-0006yj-JA for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 20:17:45 +0000
Received: from o1682455x182.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net ([168.245.5.182]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <bounces+1568871-208f-ietf-http-wg=w3.org@sendgrid.net>) id 1cnst0-0006eQ-RQ for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 20:17:40 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sendgrid.me; h=mime-version:from:subject:to:content-type; s=smtpapi; bh=l/4yROdJcRVuSgqVE7vnLXAQkSU=; b=w1mThPMuZZPYr2A8ZA3638ZtA/cXA DyimG/SLPVt4TYclgj+AEGPfibjQJED+FvdzhgNpUzDY1+CMSetNthr3KMan7svG x6B4O+FMLxh2ZSRRjZMvN1mRbTM6aYOAvCgBkVbGcSF42BeXP7lifp9yYxPy+5FS MDVQNKkdDJ+UEo=
Received: by filter1074p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter1074p1mdw1-1508-58C84FC4-49 2017-03-14 20:17:08.429864819 +0000 UTC
Received: from mail-qt0-f176.google.com (mail-qt0-f176.google.com [209.85.216.176]) by ismtpd0002p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id pWiJSddPRi-NbK--qSFTNQ for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 20:17:08.493 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qt0-f176.google.com with SMTP id x35so64752639qtc.2 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kx/RfKWowHsiVUu7rhA3uh/Hxn/xlw9h1H60/POOV8gU8vQ6QdIqQawum+0hKxC4+8W8zVxeRy+mIocg==
X-Received: by 10.200.42.151 with SMTP id b23mr38514309qta.163.1489522628019; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.177.130 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 16:17:07 -0400
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAOdDvNrZiPHrSVQSYM1F0N5G2QmqMuhBRv+_9Ay97RhGegfh5w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAOdDvNrZiPHrSVQSYM1F0N5G2QmqMuhBRv+_9Ay97RhGegfh5w@mail.gmail.com>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1142f5c220d843054ab68350"
X-SG-EID: YLWet4rakcOTMHWvPPwWbcsiUJbN1FCn0PHYd/Uujh4Mv8lNb/o+QMvAfiMo82rUgUvzCtGItVV1/M HUnj1cN76SJVRk6S2ZbykNNFHIXY3O3ZZYksm+T/45JakQtSZEAkaLkIV0x1JbRyNt5dUcvUi4A0C4 t35zEPoBwzFs+1/DAaHzrMnhC5F2Ej1cBtb+CULPSBxrQ7I9iJW5x+r2rqegfQcSRy8DnsI22ZgSeE o=
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=168.245.5.182; envelope-from=bounces+1568871-208f-ietf-http-wg=w3.org@sendgrid.net; helo=o1682455x182.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.493, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.796, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1, WEIRD_PORT=0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1cnst0-0006eQ-RQ 61af72426010996411760dd35d19cb62
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: HTTPBis Agenda for Chicago IETF 98
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAOdDvNrZiPHrSVQSYM1F0N5G2QmqMuhBRv+_9Ay97RhGegfh5w@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33723
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Folk - two things in this note for your attention

 1] An agenda for our meeting (also available in DataTracker)
 2] A note on the room layout


1] HTTP Working Group Agenda - IETF 98

* [Meeting chat](xmpp:httpbis@jabber.ietf.org?join)
* [Meetecho](http://www.meetecho.com/ietf98/httpbis) remote participation
* [Minutes](http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/ietf98httpbis)

*Taking minutes? See [our guide](
https://github.com/httpwg/wiki/wiki/TakingMinutes)*


## Friday, 31 March 2017

_9:00-11:30, Vevey 1/2_

### Administrivia

* 2 min - Blue sheets / scribe selection / NOTE WELL
* 3 min - Agenda bashing


### Active Drafts (12 minutes each)

* [Early Hints](https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints)
* [Expect-CT](https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct)
* [Header Common Structure](
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure)
* [Immutable Responses](
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-immutable)
* [Cache Digests for HTTP/2](
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-digest)
* [The ORIGIN HTTP/2 Frame](
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-origin-frame)
* [RFC6265bis: Cookies](
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis)
* [Random Access and Live Content](
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-rand-access-live)

### QUIC Working Group Collaboration

* 25 min - Mike Bishop -- Update on the mapping of HTTP/2 and QUIC

### Feedback

* 10 min - Feng Qian -- Cross Layer Interaction of H2 Connection Management

### Possible Future Work

* 10 min - Mark Nottingham -- Retry / Replay and HTTP

2] FYI - regarding the room, we are currently scheduled for the
"experimental room layout" experiment so there will be a twist in how we
are seated. We're on Friday though, so hopefully by then its old news. I
thought Lars had a good note on this to the QUIC wg who has the same
situation:

"[..] this room will have a conference or U-shape table up front, with
space for about 30 people. It will also have classroom-style seating for
about another 120.

The idea of the experiment is to get away from the mic-line-statement-style
of interaction, to a more free-flowing discussion the table, which
hopefully will allow for better communication and faster progress.

If you are a regular participant, please do sit at the conference table, no
need to ask. This obviously includes our document editors, folks in the
"contributors" team on GitHub, but also everyone else who expects to
comment on things. If you're in doubt whether you should sit at the table,
sit at the table.

There will obviously still be the regular floor mics, and all contributions
carry the same weight and will be recognized in the same way. The
conference table setup is simply an experiment to see if a different kind
of room arrangement would better suit certain WGs.

Please do let the chairs and ADs know afterwards if you felt like the
experiment worked out or not, and why!"