Re: HTTPBis Agenda for Chicago IETF 98

[Martin Thomson <[e-mail]>]

Patrick, do you have documents you can link to for the last three
items?  I have two of these, so I'm only asking as a service to
others; does the connection management item have any background
reading material associated with it?

On 15 March 2017 at 07:17, Patrick McManus <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Folk - two things in this note for your attention
>
>  1] An agenda for our meeting (also available in DataTracker)
>  2] A note on the room layout
>
>
> 1] HTTP Working Group Agenda - IETF 98
>
> * [Meeting chat](xmpp:[e-mail]?join)
> * [Meetecho](http://www.meetecho.com/ietf98/httpbis) remote participation
> * [Minutes](http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/ietf98httpbis)
>
> *Taking minutes? See [our
> guide](https://github.com/httpwg/wiki/wiki/TakingMinutes)*
>
>
> ## Friday, 31 March 2017
>
> _9:00-11:30, Vevey 1/2_
>
> ### Administrivia
>
> * 2 min - Blue sheets / scribe selection / NOTE WELL
> * 3 min - Agenda bashing
>
>
> ### Active Drafts (12 minutes each)
>
> * [Early Hints](https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints)
> * [Expect-CT](https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct)
> * [Header Common
> Structure](https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure)
> * [Immutable
> Responses](https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-immutable)
> * [Cache Digests for
> HTTP/2](https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-digest)
> * [The ORIGIN HTTP/2
> Frame](https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-origin-frame)
> * [RFC6265bis:
> Cookies](https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis)
> * [Random Access and Live
> Content](https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-rand-access-live)
>
> ### QUIC Working Group Collaboration
>
> * 25 min - Mike Bishop -- Update on the mapping of HTTP/2 and QUIC
>
> ### Feedback
>
> * 10 min - Feng Qian -- Cross Layer Interaction of H2 Connection Management
>
> ### Possible Future Work
>
> * 10 min - Mark Nottingham -- Retry / Replay and HTTP
>
> 2] FYI - regarding the room, we are currently scheduled for the
> "experimental room layout" experiment so there will be a twist in how we are
> seated. We're on Friday though, so hopefully by then its old news. I thought
> Lars had a good note on this to the QUIC wg who has the same situation:
>
> "[..] this room will have a conference or U-shape table up front, with space
> for about 30 people. It will also have classroom-style seating for about
> another 120.
>
> The idea of the experiment is to get away from the mic-line-statement-style
> of interaction, to a more free-flowing discussion the table, which hopefully
> will allow for better communication and faster progress.
>
> If you are a regular participant, please do sit at the conference table, no
> need to ask. This obviously includes our document editors, folks in the
> "contributors" team on GitHub, but also everyone else who expects to comment
> on things. If you're in doubt whether you should sit at the table, sit at
> the table.
>
> There will obviously still be the regular floor mics, and all contributions
> carry the same weight and will be recognized in the same way. The conference
> table setup is simply an experiment to see if a different kind of room
> arrangement would better suit certain WGs.
>
> Please do let the chairs and ADs know afterwards if you felt like the
> experiment worked out or not, and why!"
>