Re: status of rfc6265bis?
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Tue, 14 February 2017 00:37 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1CB8129437 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:37:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id morDFSIib8Zj for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:37:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4B83129462 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:37:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1cdR40-0005Te-3w for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:33:48 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:33:48 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1cdR40-0005Te-3w@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1cdR3t-0005St-C8 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:33:41 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1cdR3n-0006W3-5W for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:33:35 +0000
Received: from [192.168.3.104] (unknown [124.189.98.244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 012BC22E1F3; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 19:33:11 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <9ac4864d-bf50-d2f2-8b9f-9a81d6e30933@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 11:33:08 +1100
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5E49E499-FCF0-45CE-8C40-BF0708E3ECE4@mnot.net>
References: <9ac4864d-bf50-d2f2-8b9f-9a81d6e30933@gmx.de>
To: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=2.592, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1cdR3n-0006W3-5W 60272a630df3acefc78e40eae8da5e3c
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: status of rfc6265bis?
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/5E49E499-FCF0-45CE-8C40-BF0708E3ECE4@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33485
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On 13 Feb 2017, at 10:45 pm, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > > so what's going on here? It seems nothing has happened since early October? Are we still working on this? We (the chairs) have talked to the editor, and he assures us that he'll be able to start in earnest in the near future. Stay tuned. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
- status of rfc6265bis? Julian Reschke
- Re: status of rfc6265bis? Daniel Veditz
- Re: status of rfc6265bis? Julian Reschke
- Re: status of rfc6265bis? Adam Barth
- Re: status of rfc6265bis? Mark Nottingham