IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: status of rfc6265bis?

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Mon, 13 February 2017 16:53 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D12129642 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 08:53:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dvgYSSrpL9yH for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 08:53:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20A50129441 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 08:53:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1cdJqJ-0008M8-5l for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:51:11 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:51:11 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1cdJqJ-0008M8-5l@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1cdJqE-0008KL-PQ for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:51:06 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1cdJq4-0001e9-Uz for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:51:01 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.197] ([5.10.171.186]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M6zkD-1cQl3R1Ddt-00wkbV; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 17:50:28 +0100
To: Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com>
References: <9ac4864d-bf50-d2f2-8b9f-9a81d6e30933@gmx.de> <CADYDTCBqE2RbCiubun+YY32PMzqz9NYRChBKfLSKMdps6J4YWA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <9fa13da9-ec62-d952-25c0-81391acbacb4@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 17:50:28 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CADYDTCBqE2RbCiubun+YY32PMzqz9NYRChBKfLSKMdps6J4YWA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:853bputjUQd0LVCcqXwY5XYR39cQLbpVjjrlAL0+3W6P7lz13zm tpDLydKRy0/y/RVzjHhxFwDJFijTjZlOayUpEf4rFIHd6vm6d736ZMCxDuRQFBOK//9jDwx cNj5506Ix+bXnZSz1J6sTE1ykBvifsJI3eZ1IDmGEZPZh6HKf12Jp7RO8ivyHgcmrfPHEZc ovumsb6Bxf/iWb6YeVp8A==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:6n4Hxd4QxTo=:Jvq6QkBnnkierdbdO373rQ 14ZXRpH59rgbUPFn31WPDa16H9DzRUz0SICzrz2FATzvrmfR7x+uLT5TAkKSy5lVQqU2N+Bwk rv5EB1jxAu7LxqIrk3z+JrQM00JB+v+ugXpkryQoKAw/5j8xv1k3OSpPgYb3YfWGR6RS26tu4 683ki84Eohg8nb7fglDqdvubvocD6E7V4tbX+7J64oSfV9YMg6s7IFnVpsNoF7mkjQEMW5Poc e8txFI92gpBrT6rIbS0CTQtKX4f5XFMXhQEqvgWcYPbSDkegZ+gj8TjNtcRij1ksupxoQBnhV /sS2BXuyvYl9nKLzBAp0UXjRuouipTb2cBxxRq83g2+zaYaBvpbjNqX/EHUTPyIFwsNOzGUXa J0Hq+4ZGTZs9z/gshSEDGEyHxKbKOSRktpsJRkBD0wMN7Gn6FrvE4Xl5vKRZPXe1qb1CNQFy8 UGzzD3XK1B48QBVy7djHP92r3FttKq+gfq+/r/9vFBBpJrnd6dSfgXJqhm3Ehs0xGwhxeAl7o wlaj/PW1YXtGk0Xe52sAEJV2VYZIAWvJIEMPfKJ4R9ZwWrlJriweguFBibP7Mub9L+l15cdWj vmpGpDHkXme5NqTj7Gkbw5BNPRqtbqw3cf486EF6TGlG+QToVfREfZK7s4ye5mko79/gPBSgp U/9CxgiW1os7lUl5GWOsCoGzWRA6rFG+ViUuOxVs111gVD8LwugoDy3NZmuCOQODPpHAa1/xO aRywh1NztqqGiul++O4nb3bjypElaQxOyETM1H3cmQjTZmmMnlm/PPoD1AcTbZNlze3PhFxg2 aL1gaAT
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.15.15; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.252, BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1cdJq4-0001e9-Uz 4caa4d5980b0b6ca75dc3cc27d43acdd
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: status of rfc6265bis?
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/9fa13da9-ec62-d952-25c0-81391acbacb4@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33483
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2017-02-13 17:23, Daniel Veditz wrote:
> Currently all the major browser engines agree and return the quotes as
> part of the cookie, which seems to be what the spec says (DQUOTEs are
> part of the cookie value). Most servers seem to work fine with this
> behavior and no one knows what will break if browsers start handling
> this differently.

That's how I read the spec as well; however, I failed to convince the 
main Apache HttpClient committer. Maybe there's something we can do to 
make it clearer.

> Browsers also allow, and some web applications use, spaces and UTF-8
> sequences in cookies which are technically not valid cookie-octets; we
> should probably make this part of the spec match reality if we can
> figure out what that is.
> ...

Agreed.

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email