IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Call for Adoption: Binary Representation of HTTP Messages

Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> Tue, 09 November 2021 14:02 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E72F3A0D6E for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 06:02:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.769
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.769 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tLT5ZrtnQqkn for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 06:02:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C72E3A0D6F for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 06:02:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1mkRfe-0000yo-Bo for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 14:00:18 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 14:00:18 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1mkRfe-0000yo-Bo@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>) id 1mkRfd-0000xt-33 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 14:00:17 +0000
Received: from mail-ed1-x532.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::532]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>) id 1mkRfX-0004cv-Gu for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 14:00:16 +0000
Received: by mail-ed1-x532.google.com with SMTP id f4so76753259edx.12 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 06:00:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2JQbQcqKgYpHzEUxCGwBIpJnE0xLrXcVEFj0JClqvA0=; b=eh5mfwA9VI1qtIIg7wrIPe9bNvhZUP6EivCAZhidXGjRm9mFJexpwcBpBQVUdZfNTI TJLVvgwGQ0krpdPLBKBikzr69AXIT502oHetzVaTVyA9iUHhoCkCtlVrfNirhOXBxN/W 5B2lMegSxiNY4yKJBizgPTdToba0SpdnEpPrdrnIi+GugehYrm6A1O0wKr3GnnDtpbWD 1CT5CKMEVtPBPkV38IKwO+xFqE+w3TZJyt0P3O44HRFXC8Poufnz7B795Z3g++0gTrQV 6QbxZuHn/rSWgtixO2gTJFo9j7w3dCoDpfMDTZiyeUlYMARCg/WQ3v4WdUtw52Z3wggH qqdg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2JQbQcqKgYpHzEUxCGwBIpJnE0xLrXcVEFj0JClqvA0=; b=nokz4wd5yq0Ljoq02B8rHMvEGIMB8BmhuAIDFqbYM3X7nTD08X59oNy5hpYJEhOcZD pc9G2wOokW3VlkYN/noBifHPd79jswsWrG/f8NGXK2avGyBZAQ1oMdaGHiZZcjjNjX9P jCc3QgyGT2zyaXqrrAFg+bUUPdZxflTK59RHIIK/Uy/k9FFd7uKSvl8RFFaloGrj+V9s j/Sj0p7XN8EjTcFQx+r3SXPwIicfd6J+6vHt8dbbB6f9a7ssLD6/ybpIp7uY3KHoIYTE 8sG0v4toGAnOlO0czgkIo4vaF8dv3EJQUuFcsxsDTwP3Jn0Bl6m1eVoA0ikHOzv+oQ2g 7stA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531oRW2zUhF+8+ElkoSsSRGNxYebAVzT9hDLWpj/mVhpse/IpaRU vLlVb0KBUNRfHYcAVK6JgUsOtiMCqWxLIbPptgc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxYOwuGZeGK0flrWQI4ynhfMsXFNHfiyL1Tvf6U1oq7/e86MTVUF1neRmHcoD8Pzab8zsfsx1y8Ah6PpkI+Xsc=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:6ea8:: with SMTP id sh40mr9801480ejc.53.1636466400237; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 06:00:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <B688530D-FB61-40CB-89D7-BCF5351817E8@mnot.net> <20211109135125.GF16668@1wt.eu>
In-Reply-To: <20211109135125.GF16668@1wt.eu>
From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 13:59:47 +0000
Message-ID: <CALGR9oZGYx0WDF3tM+ZC9Amw9n16HVAOhGmDroE4bpxfKhfboQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000791d6205d05b86c4"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::532; envelope-from=lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com; helo=mail-ed1-x532.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com domain=gmail.com), signature is good
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1mkRfX-0004cv-Gu 0bb06963f53b27ca8174e53abc0838df
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption: Binary Representation of HTTP Messages
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CALGR9oZGYx0WDF3tM+ZC9Amw9n16HVAOhGmDroE4bpxfKhfboQ@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/39548
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I support adoption.

I am curious what relationship (if any) there is to the binary structured
fields I-D [1].

Cheers,
Lucas

[1]
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottingham-binary-structured-headers/

On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 1:55 PM Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 10:17:03PM +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > This draft was discussed in our last interim, and there seemed to be
> interest
> > in adoption. Additionally, the newly formed OHAI working group has a
> > dependency on it:
> >   <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thomson-http-binary-message/>
> >
> > So, this kicks off a one-week call for adoption for this draft. Please
> > respond saying whether you support adoption of this draft as a work item.
>
> For having worked on related concepts on this in the past, I think it
> makes a lot of sense to try to standardize a way to reliably serialize
> a message.
>
> Thus +1 for adoption!
> Willy
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email