IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Call for Adoption: Binary Representation of HTTP Messages

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Tue, 09 November 2021 15:32 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9406E3A05C7 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 07:32:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.77
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.77 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=SNzJUkd+; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=NxfdUrXu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kBkd_2CucWWS for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 07:32:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 635773A0CF9 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 07:31:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1mkT5d-0000PU-F6 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 15:31:13 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 15:31:13 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1mkT5d-0000PU-F6@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1mkT5b-0000OT-9V for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 15:31:11 +0000
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.19]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1mkT5X-0007dA-IY for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 15:31:11 +0000
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCDDE3200F9C; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 10:30:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 09 Nov 2021 10:30:54 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm1; bh=E +DvRTHakeU9FMY1dfvZdhNNaiLhM2sY+mpBzcSM+Ds=; b=SNzJUkd+MNd5SQzFC CmSpB+7vnuQ2ehnqDXmGg4t5WES1NNl0rZWT25MKE0RE3Wl3S82POxYBBVgq6CFP k/XAX6S1KcVNelOSYg9H1Hrv5IP2ow85ZbAhRhY5ctAXlo+g2k6DhKIwiOpPbuXX unntlJTQ8k4t6duw3jC2w1JL06fTofwkOcIPeLFo8lDpozquBDoTc1S+6BrIYIii n7+RUinaxj7+F+qUPqEXXw7d7q48axgE4RWWfQ7EaMuf3WD1KhtRYkio+z4d6JkR 06npb3sB4L2d/Z966EF5GRO9NOxCK8vCXBynyRDImWjhMtiaf9+xmPYauh3pPk9j PxWFA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=E+DvRTHakeU9FMY1dfvZdhNNaiLhM2sY+mpBzcSM+ Ds=; b=NxfdUrXuEdMVY/ZmeN3rJ3U6XpYEZ2eVQLyDt1MMeuNbgij3j3gww11Z1 8iGoA6l9xS5RpMwC621LcA2bivmeCdlBenE9+RxhFyxnfPDo77ktXdHt0y22FSmj YKXmUWxgVxfswv6OMM8lMKRHrm1vAfNeNM+gBUosjdjt8D0p5xXubtdKyM4o0Db4 vcLC8BsBypX4syAQgfGZMPCObu4yiVCoTJWVPIryN0EbSGrDSG44UZZ6LeMP9HtX vRi78k4ZXaDNOKGPwoLHwwKjbax2TNdwLhO7/pzxJHUmc7r+NnwTNZMxEzSaANgw 4MOcwhNfmrVd30MNPgJ6iEmbsQJDA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:KZSKYcTwcInfvo1pD5rL0V5j5CY9Y1EfrNYefDcyUtO8zX26fIYD7A> <xme:KZSKYZy3DDIOFuCNtTvx98982aVcLs0H9TUgNswECBidmNds9gei5ikn0wsmfJANP -J7CIgCrifilaxFOw>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:KZSKYZ2tkD8jkvFRJ_LwVo4Cg3loAFyrHr4dWQDK0YTYm6v_BzxiEaPBiLI6_fKJMT4rPfcd5cOgN7L2NNH3vdb71fBvUYcvHiGnvIOR5V4PTvY5HgOOXRPu>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrudeggdejiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeforghrkhcu pfhothhtihhnghhhrghmuceomhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepkeduvdeljeegtefhveekhfdtveekleevkeefgeeludeihfdugedvieeuffdttdfh necuffhomhgrihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghdpmhhnohhtrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrh fuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgv th
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:KZSKYQBmNIQzmaobyYFSiES1Wy7mWbFfLsW3fzrtJ6KdHt53TQ1PxA> <xmx:KZSKYVgyN6K8b47v0ZgtP-VwK0RIX6ZtND9xnooKxhP00GadSF9BLQ> <xmx:KZSKYcobwuIHENHpkJDfFqZID32Oc68SGPjBGZbBA5hkQbpc5UNhhA> <xmx:KpSKYTb3fip1gZJYHCeHLYqiftXMUdYSrXpAMnrABrOu7K6M5J9fvQ>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 10:30:47 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.20.0.1.32\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <CALGR9oZGYx0WDF3tM+ZC9Amw9n16HVAOhGmDroE4bpxfKhfboQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 02:30:43 +1100
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <36AD2B90-FCFD-4EB5-BF1C-A42520AF212E@mnot.net>
References: <B688530D-FB61-40CB-89D7-BCF5351817E8@mnot.net> <20211109135125.GF16668@1wt.eu> <CALGR9oZGYx0WDF3tM+ZC9Amw9n16HVAOhGmDroE4bpxfKhfboQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.20.0.1.32)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.19; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com
X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=mnot@mnot.net domain=mnot.net), signature is good
X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=mnot@mnot.net domain=messagingengine.com), signature is good
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1mkT5X-0007dA-IY 9701bb9fded7e77eafbd377bbcf2137f
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption: Binary Representation of HTTP Messages
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/36AD2B90-FCFD-4EB5-BF1C-A42520AF212E@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/39551
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

No real relationship (at least yet).

> On 10 Nov 2021, at 12:59 am, Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I support adoption.
> 
> I am curious what relationship (if any) there is to the binary structured fields I-D [1].
> 
> Cheers,
> Lucas
> 
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottingham-binary-structured-headers/
> 
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 1:55 PM Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 10:17:03PM +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> > 
> > This draft was discussed in our last interim, and there seemed to be interest
> > in adoption. Additionally, the newly formed OHAI working group has a
> > dependency on it:
> >   <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thomson-http-binary-message/>
> > 
> > So, this kicks off a one-week call for adoption for this draft. Please
> > respond saying whether you support adoption of this draft as a work item.
> 
> For having worked on related concepts on this in the past, I think it
> makes a lot of sense to try to standardize a way to reliably serialize
> a message.
> 
> Thus +1 for adoption!
> Willy
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email