IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: JSON headers

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 12 July 2016 08:01 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE93412D0CA for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 01:01:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.208
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.208 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id auMuNr6xpamu for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 01:01:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C50712D744 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 01:01:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1bMsYT-0008VF-D5 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 07:56:33 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 07:56:33 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1bMsYT-0008VF-D5@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <cabo@tzi.org>) id 1bMsYQ-0008UY-QK for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 07:56:30 +0000
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <cabo@tzi.org>) id 1bMsYJ-0001wj-Vw for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 07:56:25 +0000
Received: from mfilter34-d.gandi.net (mfilter34-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.165]) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A57C31720E9; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 09:56:01 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter34-d.gandi.net
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([IPv6:::ffff:217.70.183.196]) by mfilter34-d.gandi.net (mfilter34-d.gandi.net [::ffff:10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9EZcRuHDLzSp; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 09:55:29 +0200 (CEST)
X-Originating-IP: 93.199.242.26
Received: from nar-3.local (p5DC7F21A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.199.242.26]) (Authenticated sender: cabo@cabo.im) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BCF02172117; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 09:55:21 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <5784A267.1050406@tzi.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 09:55:19 +0200
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 4.0.8 (Macintosh/20151105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <8251.1468229350@critter.freebsd.dk> <e9a55629-656c-3b6a-3ac4-5fb7a109b2f0@gmx.de> <8739.1468234635@critter.freebsd.dk> <38b3e7bb-3202-f489-ff15-d4d545e13ca0@gmx.de> <8854.1468236033@critter.freebsd.dk> <326f0b93-dbd5-3dfb-2a35-d1bf084684b4@gmx.de> <9221.1468245597@critter.freebsd.dk> <aa9cee9c-d8e3-17ba-9fcd-e327575cd5a8@gmx.de> <9801.1468259070@critter.freebsd.dk> <15d27f23-6b51-1e8e-3f10-194c80570424@gmx.de> <20160711190107.GB9542@1wt.eu> <0e467573-4f68-80a5-14a4-5a63b41ac4d4@gmx.de> <57841F4A.30901@tzi.org> <57e2c1b6-749f-c697-5c92-15eeb44b303b@gmx.de> <57849130.4060104@tzi.org> <928f8531-6573-caf6-50c1-1672cc020959@gmx.de> <11907e5a-bab7-ec9b-2bd4-e8447573edf4@treenet.co.nz>
In-Reply-To: <11907e5a-bab7-ec9b-2bd4-e8447573edf4@treenet.co.nz>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.637, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1bMsYJ-0001wj-Vw 2c342983192b58ad192892d2f6a17ba6
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: JSON headers
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/5784A267.1050406@tzi.org>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/31921
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Amos Jeffries wrote:
> But using a textual representation on the wire for future improvements
> is something we should be looking at avoiding, not encouraging.

Going to a JSON-like data model would also prepare using other
representations (such as binary ones) of that data model.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email