Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-cache-header-00.txt

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Fri, 07 September 2018 06:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31D91286D9 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 23:47:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=bOdNMMWv; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=hLhzXrMT
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8QVe2nziy2Gr for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 23:47:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [IPv6:2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D611127333 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 23:47:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1fyAW6-0005iT-Su for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2018 06:45:18 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2018 06:45:18 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1fyAW6-0005iT-Su@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:4f]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1fyAW1-0005fd-QO for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2018 06:45:13 +0000
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1fyAVz-0002QF-FA for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2018 06:45:13 +0000
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7FE421EEB for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 02:44:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 07 Sep 2018 02:44:50 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:date:from:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=19HDgD d2+80h0s1RBtNkhDIOxlA3IU1LaFHCbbojvas=; b=bOdNMMWvd5oAzoQElDsCkz JS8T2M91Kd1rfXcyU5lk1RROyWUc3z1zLfpyHqMN+eU6s8OHCUyHN7ZS06oLiqDp vcIUt+/7qdPWYDoW1hcNk4he3wHnlpfX+H62Ee1XOWVWpsfE/R3aQ2nhEaBvcuub q5zE/pXu9CbEi5QJWStF2mCZ/9LfzRKTfiajZWeDL+Fs0zLYcHF9H0yF/DEmBTGV e8ykTIDvgPG+DhBtgbJ8O2SrW5eR9LAzvZgWaB4E9aWWQkvqRIsgFue8WsvrK/jf 5ie6EXkQtWt5IducZQh+A/CI+Ixou1C6NwccIAg2NXXyUrO+aZGkvZ43rg4ClPOA ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=19HDgDd2+80h0s1RBtNkhDIOxlA3IU1LaFHCbbojv as=; b=hLhzXrMTi3q0vkSyt1HJVCgjEp4u5TL7O6EwXkGR46gU61q/c7ccA9Dze AI11oCfW5hXU9d2+tXqSVTJOf0sCaivzoSe9k7EhdRWQ9V6DGJ7sYRjH0QbIWPeF N5N9SxrOgo3sGox6doPkZ/uorBRmz7uS0JjYt3ZnHM9FB9Qdx8DTMl47O4gs7V8b AoGv5F/EM/9Adx5K6rEAaXds0tetHo7jNVLnOaZSVHJbDW5tvebyQDM+QwJ6L4Rj MKZkFiuQG8FNAwE51PvzTlmTk7O8v5v1EVMsPD33Tssn7hWwy18i75Ui59PlaFI2 RLnim+vvoYDvjm6OGnLVqdsuFq5CQ==
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:Yh6SW2-TfiMaK-JPwUw052gq5PdlCI7AqlHVfB8WwS2TdVo6fAXf1w> <xmx:Yh6SW2529zU8x7EQ-q7SUmUMlc5hKot_QdhXHz9BTBqgRdHosC1R7A> <xmx:Yh6SW92JBggCPl26Q-RorPiP9i05gRiVrP6a0ZlgDmtxK8vPSPERjA> <xmx:Yh6SW9C-J_LOWICCbD_FfOKesc-A4qCokX7bbM0KYPE0dSnfwuajyA> <xmx:Yh6SW_0Js7X38iYem-La7A8yZbVlaRigsipvXWAdlzaHqR6x5I5ZHw> <xmx:Yh6SW9TUkLLm242-ESqyo5VvNj6P_6hJ7QkYkuyPfg2XtGuuGvBytg>
X-ME-Sender: <xms:YR6SW-p4s9WsAEAhoP7lgZ-y7RIKZyxqXjJZPM-7zhITyyIppGUngQ>
Received: from attitudadjuster.mnot.net (unknown [144.136.175.28]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E656A10293 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 02:44:48 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CAA808E2-8CDE-4333-83AF-185DA31F2A43"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Message-Id: <AEDC275A-8CE2-48F4-B08A-8791FB0443B1@mnot.net>
References: <153630251281.11674.4222139546682549239.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2018 16:44:46 +1000
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=3.090, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1fyAVz-0002QF-FA 379b8bb280752824cf75a9f31233a10c
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-cache-header-00.txt
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/AEDC275A-8CE2-48F4-B08A-8791FB0443B1@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/35891
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

FYI; IMO it's past time to standardise x-cache and have a real spec for it. 

This is a straw-man, based on a bit of research on existing implementations.

Pretty version at:
  https://mnot.github.io/I-D/cache-header/

Comments? I think the primary audience here is proxy cache and CDN vendors, and their users.

Cheers,



> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-cache-header-00.txt
> Date: 7 September 2018 at 4:41:52 pm AEST
> To: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-nottingham-cache-header-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Mark Nottingham and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Name:		draft-nottingham-cache-header
> Revision:	00
> Title:		The Cache HTTP Response Header
> Document date:	2018-09-07
> Group:		Individual Submission
> Pages:		7
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nottingham-cache-header-00.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottingham-cache-header/
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-cache-header-00
> Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-nottingham-cache-header
> 
> 
> Abstract:
>   To aid debugging, HTTP caches often append headers to a response
>   detailing how they handled the request.  This specification codifies
>   that practice and updates it for HTTP's current caching model.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/