IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-cache-header-00.txt

Alessandro Ghedini <alessandro@ghedini.me> Mon, 10 September 2018 14:20 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B770128CF2 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 07:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.751
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.751 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ghedini.me
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UnDYTsZlz5DG for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 07:20:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [IPv6:2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FC2D128C65 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 07:20:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1fzN1P-0006QM-TU for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 14:18:35 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 14:18:35 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1fzN1P-0006QM-TU@frink.w3.org>
Received: from uranus.w3.org ([128.30.52.58]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <alessandro@ghedini.me>) id 1fzN1K-0006Ov-Kd for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 14:18:30 +0000
Received: from www-data by uranus.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <alessandro@ghedini.me>) id 1fzN1K-0007Yj-Gw for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 14:18:30 +0000
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:4f]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <alessandro@ghedini.me>) id 1fzIRQ-0003Tu-RQ for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 09:25:09 +0000
Received: from blastoise.ghedini.me ([45.32.158.21]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <alessandro@ghedini.me>) id 1fzIRO-00034m-SZ for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 09:25:08 +0000
Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8010:6241:0:35f5:e422:cc42:f7ff]) by blastoise.ghedini.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 851D1DF4FC; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 09:24:44 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ghedini.me; s=mail; t=1536571484; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=G8zunz5f2y1q+fdP+OE3Aus2Sjuz0WzyEWJdPJpwX5M=; b=QOgqLPmjZi3/2Ex64mRSEXNGEAHm9lnndCdU2p8XrcefGZ6oh0FqyQfYwjxrltuM7q/gy5 jCv8bysL172hTOrFXfedCDMjB4SnQodu6tNz6JlWTn1vEFqO8t2LpW1yjlsWnL1WbWP9xg rT0Nr3yGvaIxms/eVJE1R3Ia6qYu6VA=
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 10:24:43 +0100
From: Alessandro Ghedini <alessandro@ghedini.me>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20180910092443.GA3775@pinky.flat11.house>
References: <153630251281.11674.4222139546682549239.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <AEDC275A-8CE2-48F4-B08A-8791FB0443B1@mnot.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AEDC275A-8CE2-48F4-B08A-8791FB0443B1@mnot.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1fzIRO-00034m-SZ 4885564025735faecff7aca070ef6c4e
X-caa-id: 10597bf9a0
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-cache-header-00.txt
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/20180910092443.GA3775@pinky.flat11.house>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/35898
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 04:44:46PM +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> FYI; IMO it's past time to standardise x-cache and have a real spec for it. 
> 
> This is a straw-man, based on a bit of research on existing implementations.
> 
> Pretty version at:
>   https://mnot.github.io/I-D/cache-header/
> 
> Comments? I think the primary audience here is proxy cache and CDN vendors, and their users.

This seems like a useful thing. Now to the bikeshedding: "Cache" seems a bit
too generic to me, "Cache-Status" maybe?

Also agree that the "ERROR" cache-action seems redundant given that we already
have ways to signal errors with status codes.

Cheers

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email