IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New Version Notification for draft-kerwin-http2-encoded-data-01.txt

Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> Wed, 23 July 2014 07:37 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A4951A00C9 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 00:37:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qQQzB0dnYCit for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 00:37:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BBA81A00FC for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 00:37:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1X9r5W-0002IY-3C for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 07:35:46 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 07:35:46 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1X9r5W-0002IY-3C@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <grmocg@gmail.com>) id 1X9r5F-0002Gz-QJ for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 07:35:29 +0000
Received: from mail-oi0-f46.google.com ([209.85.218.46]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <grmocg@gmail.com>) id 1X9r5B-0001pt-Vq for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 07:35:29 +0000
Received: by mail-oi0-f46.google.com with SMTP id i138so577094oig.19 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 00:35:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=FSh83y8UbKTdU36HZC7wDRc7VrSctEFjQffzFSCbft0=; b=veY0P7+2jbjS3NmkWwweIjlRJd1I7sBDnHtY2wxidxOzJUxS/O/Z8cuk1qainKH7TK T5xebepMWM4JCs0uvEGQ5oAbJMxu/PSZm8vXFTYM5smv33wtWPL8tmiCTw+9THXeIeRb Be5McOP+C+0Cx3mx42QRIV4qayXs0jbv2N4Rz2wJiuYEsodQdCw2RkCvLFZickdlswVY WBmwm4fTTaVm2lEyLLtpPYjafQsgWWYP13xQFxwvhWoi03+tn1KuUCcpbFDV6AFJMSNW gXytUrbb+pY3abCn72XBb7XWZqLEB0c6YLnMWUUibNwOmQ+H9J8H58btonjfmdGQFqrK kwoQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.224.227 with SMTP id rf3mr25038036obc.70.1406100900011; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 00:35:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.1.19 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 00:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53CF57A7.4010300@treenet.co.nz>
References: <20140721234651.7996.35285.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CACweHNDQ-rVJW6_uq=3H4Pcnf2NdbdE058OvXUVEnmfh+DJSnA@mail.gmail.com> <CAH_y2NGrwbUiOEHiux4e7qz=HHM3xSBRojpURkOO6d6E4ca5FA@mail.gmail.com> <CACweHNC6Pd_TSw2bBumFDiWDNxcxUHZZnm5=HvV76jGwVzDrYA@mail.gmail.com> <53CF3F43.5040609@treenet.co.nz> <CAP+FsNeAVHv+YoWwsA9u24ZPp-Au_FnVDqw6_wfv0AA_D0v-cg@mail.gmail.com> <53CF57A7.4010300@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 00:34:59 -0700
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNdoo1zh6b_P6UcStxHaomp4fu3H_Mto7wvkmMNKfyZ01w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e013a05dea9e58104fed76093"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.218.46; envelope-from=grmocg@gmail.com; helo=mail-oi0-f46.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.718, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1X9r5B-0001pt-Vq da11d8c7b45619fb802752452aa2e59c
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-kerwin-http2-encoded-data-01.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAP+FsNdoo1zh6b_P6UcStxHaomp4fu3H_Mto7wvkmMNKfyZ01w@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/26310
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Just look up the arguments for/against end_segment.



On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
wrote:

> On 23/07/2014 5:56 p.m., Roberto Peon wrote:
> > Actually, it is an issue, so long as there is no ordering requirement on
> > extension frames (as we'd have had with END_SEGMENT).
> >
> > We've not imposed (actually removed) such restrictions on proxies, and so
> > we may find that there is no way to do it in the future. That would be a
> > sad day.
> > -=R
> >
>
> Reference please. I see no mention of proxies being allowed to re-order
> any frame type (even control frames) *within* a stream in h2-13.
>
> Amos
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email