IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New Version Notification for draft-kerwin-http2-encoded-data-01.txt

Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> Wed, 23 July 2014 06:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BCAE1A004B for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 23:38:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JUjGXqgJvzhd for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 23:38:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5EF31A0032 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 23:38:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1X9qA3-0006rn-RK for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 06:36:23 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 06:36:23 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1X9qA3-0006rn-RK@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1X9q9i-0006pB-Sw for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 06:36:02 +0000
Received: from 121-99-228-82.static.orcon.net.nz ([121.99.228.82] helo=treenet.co.nz) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1X9q9i-0002QP-0V for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 06:36:02 +0000
Received: from [192.168.0.6] (121-99-48-157.bng1.tvc.orcon.net.nz [121.99.48.157]) by treenet.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id F02C2E6DE8; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 18:35:28 +1200 (NZST)
Message-ID: <53CF57A7.4010300@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 18:35:19 +1200
From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <20140721234651.7996.35285.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CACweHNDQ-rVJW6_uq=3H4Pcnf2NdbdE058OvXUVEnmfh+DJSnA@mail.gmail.com> <CAH_y2NGrwbUiOEHiux4e7qz=HHM3xSBRojpURkOO6d6E4ca5FA@mail.gmail.com> <CACweHNC6Pd_TSw2bBumFDiWDNxcxUHZZnm5=HvV76jGwVzDrYA@mail.gmail.com> <53CF3F43.5040609@treenet.co.nz> <CAP+FsNeAVHv+YoWwsA9u24ZPp-Au_FnVDqw6_wfv0AA_D0v-cg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP+FsNeAVHv+YoWwsA9u24ZPp-Au_FnVDqw6_wfv0AA_D0v-cg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=121.99.228.82; envelope-from=squid3@treenet.co.nz; helo=treenet.co.nz
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.416, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TVD_RCVD_IP=0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1X9q9i-0002QP-0V b60663a4dd0d329f7576d86b40dfbe2b
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-kerwin-http2-encoded-data-01.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/53CF57A7.4010300@treenet.co.nz>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/26308
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 23/07/2014 5:56 p.m., Roberto Peon wrote:
> Actually, it is an issue, so long as there is no ordering requirement on
> extension frames (as we'd have had with END_SEGMENT).
> 
> We've not imposed (actually removed) such restrictions on proxies, and so
> we may find that there is no way to do it in the future. That would be a
> sad day.
> -=R
> 

Reference please. I see no mention of proxies being allowed to re-order
any frame type (even control frames) *within* a stream in h2-13.

Amos

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email