IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: bohe and delta experimentation...

Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> Wed, 16 January 2013 23:48 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1789811E80D2 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:48:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.57
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.57 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.028, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o2Kk5HO6dCGW for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:48:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6575B21F8716 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:48:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1Tvcie-0003bV-C7 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 23:48:32 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 23:48:32 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1Tvcie-0003bV-C7@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <grmocg@gmail.com>) id 1Tvcib-0003al-B7 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 23:48:29 +0000
Received: from mail-la0-f47.google.com ([209.85.215.47]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <grmocg@gmail.com>) id 1Tvcia-0003WB-MU for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 23:48:29 +0000
Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id fh20so2012568lab.20 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:48:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=VRypRSyH0qVfSV/1SS+leDVafagDL+efdPisOsInrjs=; b=mWrn9sTGqhWK+Cr6cFiJSNXo+6HrF42TvpIUuT1Lbb2sag5198LZLGHWqYdv9jBKE8 WUjIRJkhFJiTqbY8QVXDmJY1Xf6YzbtY94S7ZM6g1ANZdjsvMU69DCmHG+ouCqmq0GpI IeNh6BEB0NYsuFgrULsSMpMleYhX9qR4KGHbjcgvYQjet0trfwNrMxViL6cBwa1l5fLk O1+DzVOUT5wbkTlMV1nGPFl5q1fJ6eheWrAJCiZgMMOVChI0yWDYMpq/ncWPq5dzXyWB vRw0no3w+P+ctq7jee8FowlIiqas/vjgfDdbUCBjeUlwA6awXFqwIwrjFr6vfyZjTdwg 2aaA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.110.18 with SMTP id hw18mr2916841lab.22.1358380082032; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:48:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.81.5 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:48:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAK3OfOhewuVdjxu7UUp49g8B33YZNJ_N-PkASkHLP213+8gquA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABP7RbeNFm3ZHdtDBUJb3idJjFj0q+fxDPzxKZBhSJqXw8zWaQ@mail.gmail.com> <2FD0BBE1-59C6-4E49-ACCE-60C1A895FB7D@mnot.net> <CABP7RbdXh1mb_P-HQucksiHc1So0ggVxH5v8y7vk13g+CcWe-Q@mail.gmail.com> <DD2EFC9F-5201-4829-9E6F-BD9CF0307BB0@mnot.net> <CAK3OfOj1O82WqO0L0rNpq2qeKJoT9E0ZQrV6Y=ULETtACpYMag@mail.gmail.com> <CAK3OfOgOGFNbve_QrTrCesqrrAQRH5qWgvebBxAhoMD7_MjhjQ@mail.gmail.com> <0A36AEB6-09B9-462F-B2E8-90B67FE69980@mnot.net> <CAK3OfOhewuVdjxu7UUp49g8B33YZNJ_N-PkASkHLP213+8gquA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:48:01 -0800
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNdi4=Am7pZdKySHZESp79BzRzPaR3UGQM2dsOM-yAxBOA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec54d4de8426e5a04d37082cb"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.215.47; envelope-from=grmocg@gmail.com; helo=mail-la0-f47.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.711, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1Tvcia-0003WB-MU 340f11ea69d16c79334bc1a1b6146817
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAP+FsNdi4=Am7pZdKySHZESp79BzRzPaR3UGQM2dsOM-yAxBOA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/15925
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

How about setting epoch as the first request in the connection? :)
-=R


On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> > On 17/01/2013, at 10:35 AM, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:
> > Yep, but you either need to make the epoch start at least a few years
> ago (old Last-Modified times, is important for heuristic freshness), OR
> keep it signed (losing a bit).
> >
> > And I think you need more than 12 bits for seconds in a day...
>
> Oops, for some reason I thought of seconds in an hour.  So 5 more
> bits, and we're about even with seconds since epoch.  Either way
> getting from 24 bytes to 4 is pretty good, and no compression scheme
> will do better.
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email