IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: bohe and delta experimentation...

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 17 January 2013 01:19 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46A9B11E80A6 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:19:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=3.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9HeoS+6MGg3A for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:19:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B23EF11E809C for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:19:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1Tve8L-0003t8-Ay for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 01:19:09 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 01:19:09 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1Tve8L-0003t8-Ay@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1Tve8I-0003sS-HN for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 01:19:06 +0000
Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1Tve8H-0006bT-Uh for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 01:19:06 +0000
Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id hn14so4046241wib.16 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:18:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=s7BfVnWEfahDjZH140nN4eQF2q78YNP1CmuVuZ446xw=; b=guL63KUQ6luXpOLFNANL7oyvzaUy+dcGyBzjkAk7AN7+V7ZbNvEY8jjj+dFYCKq9wq XtLbn1q5/VC1W+v738cufHg1ufrqRWQ0+O/0XiDhaavWpKtudfEFdEuhfOsO94k9v/Tj M61+2JduaHoWK9sO3PjdwqQO+y58xE2Jh4fKLB1syrnTBPALragBl1/xxYRAQ16aXPAs CT41HTVZdEJW7Bz8sX/LprCznubKWRZucTrELpzAggAjJ5/1K4xlkdCOrtBJ7dNEHCsA xqJ/TfWqa+cIXQZcC2X9MrutnUlBmcHvjSnpid1euWF1LBjKVemMV/2UbROBTZaSBDV8 9WJQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.19.10 with SMTP id a10mr5364355wje.45.1358385519746; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:18:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.180.164.174 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:18:39 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAOdDvNo8VH1KXNQoR2LCg=BcK40pCH8_iusJ39_HXT9P=DTYqg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABP7RbeNFm3ZHdtDBUJb3idJjFj0q+fxDPzxKZBhSJqXw8zWaQ@mail.gmail.com> <2FD0BBE1-59C6-4E49-ACCE-60C1A895FB7D@mnot.net> <CABP7RbdXh1mb_P-HQucksiHc1So0ggVxH5v8y7vk13g+CcWe-Q@mail.gmail.com> <DD2EFC9F-5201-4829-9E6F-BD9CF0307BB0@mnot.net> <CAK3OfOj1O82WqO0L0rNpq2qeKJoT9E0ZQrV6Y=ULETtACpYMag@mail.gmail.com> <CAOdDvNo8VH1KXNQoR2LCg=BcK40pCH8_iusJ39_HXT9P=DTYqg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:18:39 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXz9M3_zW=WAK2UCoLpkTj1r+WzECygfq6=Pc-VNgoo3Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Cc: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.212.171; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-wi0-f171.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.692, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1Tve8H-0006bT-Uh 7e841e3f82738ca1653ae61c78adaf47
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: bohe and delta experimentation...
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnXz9M3_zW=WAK2UCoLpkTj1r+WzECygfq6=Pc-VNgoo3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/15943
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 16 January 2013 17:13, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com> wrote:
> I'd actually like the timestamp format to support sub millisecond
> timescales.. (maybe another 8 bits) to help http scale in both directions.

There have been times when I have wanted better-than-second resolution
on HTTP dates.  I'm not sure that nanosecond resolution is really
necessary, but I'm not fundamentally opposed to the idea.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email