draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-header-02 | Examples
Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org> Tue, 05 November 2019 05:51 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08D35120073 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 21:51:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.65
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.65 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JrNvVzGnP5Zg for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 21:51:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [IPv6:2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7569D120071 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 21:51:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1iRrhS-0004ac-MW for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 05:48:18 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2019 05:48:18 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1iRrhS-0004ac-MW@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:4f]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <khurtta@welho.com>) id 1iRrhP-0004Zr-Nw for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 05:48:15 +0000
Received: from welho-filter4.welho.com ([83.102.41.26]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <khurtta@welho.com>) id 1iRrhN-0001Je-78 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 05:48:15 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by welho-filter4.welho.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 076CE45C45; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 07:48:10 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at pp.htv.fi
Received: from welho-smtp3.welho.com ([IPv6:::ffff:83.102.41.86]) by localhost (welho-filter4.welho.com [::ffff:83.102.41.26]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XyQ1KKauMeIl; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 07:48:08 +0200 (EET)
Received: from kasvihuone.keh.iki.fi (89-27-39-95.bb.dnainternet.fi [89.27.39.95]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by welho-smtp3.welho.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 182D82315; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 07:48:03 +0200 (EET)
In-Reply-To: <157290998994.13980.12370421827199944473@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <157290998994.13980.12370421827199944473@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2019 07:48:03 +0200
From: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
CC: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
X-Mailer: ELM [version ME+ 2.5 PLalpha50+]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-Id: <20191105054810.076CE45C45@welho-filter4.welho.com>
Received-SPF: none client-ip=83.102.41.26; envelope-from=khurtta@welho.com; helo=welho-filter4.welho.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1iRrhN-0001Je-78 b12c8cc6c844118310c57021e0f1906e
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-header-02 | Examples
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/20191105054810.076CE45C45@welho-filter4.welho.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37119
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-header-02#section-2 | Each member of the parameterised list represents a cache that has | handled the request. The first member of the list represents the | cache closest to the origin server, and the last member of the list | represents the cache closest to the user agent (possibly including | the user agent's cache itself, if it chooses to append a value). but https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-header-02#section-3 | Going through two layers of caching, both of which were hits, and the | second collapsed with other requests: | | Cache-Status: "CDN Company Here"; res-fresh=545, | OriginCache; cache-fresh=1100; collapse-hit=?1 So "CDN Company Here" is the cache closest to the origin server ? However name indicates that OriginCache is the cache closest to the origin server, but specification says that first member ("CDN Company Here") is the cache closest to the origin server. / Kari Hurtta
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-header-02.txt internet-drafts
- draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-header-02 | Examples Kari Hurtta
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-header-02 | Examples Mark Nottingham