IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6266 (5383)

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de> Thu, 07 June 2018 13:17 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D7CD130EC1 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 06:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.752
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.752 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=greenbytes.de header.b=u0AXIc1K; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=greenbytes.de header.b=d/XjI/FK
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wJulN1LK46cM for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 06:17:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A19C130E06 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 06:17:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1fQui5-0001O3-5p for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 13:12:13 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 13:12:13 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1fQui5-0001O3-5p@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>) id 1fQui2-0001N4-2O for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 13:12:10 +0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de ([217.91.35.233]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>) id 1fQui0-00052M-00 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 13:12:09 +0000
Received: by mail.greenbytes.de (Postfix, from userid 117) id 07EAB15A034E; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 15:11:42 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=greenbytes.de; s=mail; t=1528377103; bh=uaXVnsZapqEdKQXlVHjXo9R9m9icKHbTCUkX6ZTzobk=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=u0AXIc1KcaLM/HAmI+4YrGQaFkNivP4gcQLhr2dvFODvJn3CBwFerFYxLZ0abIoD9 oqOzSovDOi86fQN+m5dXr6wuI9PJRNHIvzJEp3VaDAXs+sIKhMSoUwYGMDmSb6YGJ6 AJ2B+adh5btznYU7D4rZROHqVwf6qTNRPFGf/NYc=
Received: from [192.168.1.34] (unknown [217.91.35.233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.greenbytes.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A419715A034E; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 15:11:41 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=greenbytes.de; s=mail; t=1528377102; bh=uaXVnsZapqEdKQXlVHjXo9R9m9icKHbTCUkX6ZTzobk=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=d/XjI/FKsZMtTaGfqHs1ioJx2rYkZuc4ec3Veg4zebq85r0TelCRuPL7s0kq6GkQv v5LRclOzHmJ1+9ASgYR5DDQqGKjO5fhKdhGnEUe/c61LSonjkQLJvqqRaMySTa6fja 0+RnCv8a/GzvLLqGDcb3Vn0ucmc2PEPcWQ20a4Gw=
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, ben@nostrum.com, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, adam@nostrum.com, mnot@mnot.net, pmcmanus@mozilla.com
Cc: magnar@myrtveit.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <20180607130307.8B911B828C3@rfc-editor.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
Message-ID: <9d18a338-3379-6cd5-4390-3441964f7dbb@greenbytes.de>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:11:38 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180607130307.8B911B828C3@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.328, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1fQui0-00052M-00 43bf6e754c5219433260da9262d82f34
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6266 (5383)
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/9d18a338-3379-6cd5-4390-3441964f7dbb@greenbytes.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/35507
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2018-06-07 15:03, RFC Errata System wrote:
> ...

I believe we should reject this erratum.

Reasons:

1) When we'll revise RFC 6266, it'll be based on RFC 8187, not RFC 5987. 
This changes the whole base (of what is defined how in the ABNF).

2) To define new parameters for Content-Disposition, a spec would have 
to update RFC 6266, in which case the WG and/or IESG will need to ensure 
that no parameter name ending in "*" is defined without using the RFC 
8187 encoding.

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email